Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the Accountability Stress Tests Meeting #4 on 15 April will be available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895714
ACTION ITEM - Steve to refine paragraph on page 1
ACTION ITEM -Jonathan to recirculate explanatory note
ACTION ITEM - remove strike through
ACTION ITEM - Read CWG input and incorporate any effect this may have on ST 21 as needed.
ACTION ITEM - Cheryl to contact Bart Boswinkel/Bernie Turcotte to incorporate language
Accountability Stress Tests WP Meeting #4 on 15 April
Link: ST-WP Drafts - http://tinyurl.com/mye8o3e
These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content of the call and do not substitute in any way the transcript.
P1 last paragraph will be edited. ST of interest to CWG will be added.
ACTION ITEM - Steve to refine paragraph on page 1
Edward Morris' additional ST will be #26
STs # 3, 4, 29, 11, 27, 17 - Board Inaction: ability to spur the Board to make a decision in order to trigger a reconsideration or IRP is not firmly established in any
of the design powers and mechanisms yet. Outreach to legal on Board inaction has not led to formal feedback. Suggestion that threaten Board of removal to solve for
Board inaction is not a formal mechanism. Expanding on ATRT recommendation #9 language in the bylaws might be sufficient to trigger the IRP and other
review mechanisms that are being worked on in Work Party 2. Conversation with WP1 to ensure inducing Board action is a community power. WP2 discussion
about whether or not existing redress mechanisms could somehow be triggered by a failure to act.
ACTION ITEM -Jonathan to recirculate explanatory note
Steve del Bianco flagged that Preserving AoC commitments in ICANN bylaws will be discussed in WP1
Suggestion that better to have Bylaw provision that forces Board an accountability to the community to respond to Advisory Committee formal advice. - Advisory Committees would benefit from this. Outreach to ACs might be needed.
Community Veto STs #3, 4, 19, 10, 20, 15
ACTION ITEM - remove strike through
ST #18 GAC
Discussion is pending. Some GAC support for ST recommendation.
Should more urgent issues come forward from WP1 - WP2, stress test 18 still needs discussion - would cut back on 14 - 17
GAO
Steve provided GAO with overview of STs
ST #21
Suggestion to amend ST 21 in light af CWG remarks concerning appeal mechanism and respect national legislation on redelegation
ACTION ITEM - Read CWG input and incorporate any effect this may have on ST 21 as needed.
Consider including reference to GAC principles
ACTION ITEM - Cheryl to contact Bart Boswinkel/Bernie Turcotte to incorporate language
