Hi Thomas

Just wondering about this statement in the paper:

The requirements were grouped into two categories:

- Enabling community empowerment over Board decisions with limited, strictly enumerated, last resort powers;

- Enhancing review and redress processes.

Does this adequately capture the extent of the mind-map and the items we had listed, particularly those that were identified as WS1? Not sure but thought I would ask.

Thanks.

Matthew

On 1/22/2015 1:43 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:

All,

we apologize for the short notice, but if you could raise objections before 17.00 UTC today, that would be most appreciated. As discussed in Frankfurt, want to make sure the community gets first handed information about the outcome of our meeting and not speculations or biased information from third party.

Kind regards,

Thomas

--
thomas-rickert.tel

Am 22.01.2015 um 14:07 schrieb Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org>:

Dear all,

On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration.

Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC.

Thank you

Best regards

Alice

<Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx>

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community