Why are you surprised?

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4

On 6 Feb 2016, at 19:20, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@fmai.org.tn> wrote:

If there is a reason for breaking the CCWG charter and taking some parts of WS 2 tasks out of the CCWG-accountability, I would like to know it.
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
            +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------







Le 5 févr. 2016 à 17:38, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> a écrit :

I think that we want a chartering process comparable to that of the CCWG. I presume that if a HR group were to come into existence and was not chartered by a reasonable number of orgs, then the Board would not agree to the "semi-binding" nature of the outcomes (forgive me inventing a new word to describe the CCWG-Board process previously agreed to).

Alan

At 05/02/2016 01:52 AM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Hello Alan,


>>  I don't understand the concept of a Cross Community WG chartered by only one AC/SO.

Good pick up.   Might be best described as "two or more",  or "at least three" if you want a minimum threshold.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community