Hi,

I think we should make a distinction; there is difference between having control on names related policies and having control over entire ICANN accountability which goes beyond the walls of names and also beyond just policies.

The accountability mechanism that has been proposed does effectively create a power shift to the community, the PDP on the other hand maintains power with where it should rightly be (based on ratification requirement).

The way the 2 scenarios is evaluated against representation would certainly be different as the risks are not the same. The way the president responds to change in states constitution vis the national constitution would sure differ.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.

On 6 Oct 2015 22:50, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:


On 06-Oct-15 17:41, Jeff Neuman wrote:
> P.S. For any future Consensus Policy, the Board has opened up a new
> area of argument if a contracted party does not want to follow
> it…..namely that the Consensus Policy was not developed through a
> sufficiently representative policy process.

Indeed.  and I can just imagine how this will play in IRP decisions.

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community