Tijani +1
I fully agree with Tijani
People misuse the opportunity to make modifications that were not agreed during the lkast 16 months
NO CHANGE NO MODIFICATIONS.
During the WSIS I WILL tell everybody that there is no supervision nor control on what we have agreed and the people will make whatever change they wish without the agreements of the others

KAVOUSS

2016-05-02 8:14 GMT+02:00 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn>:
Mathieu and all,

The modification proposed doesn’t reflect the CCWG last proposal approved by the chartering organization. I don’t think we are allowed to write bylaws that are not the exact interpretation of the approved document that had the CCWG consensus and the charting organizations ratification.
  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
            +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Le 2 mai 2016 à 04:23, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> a écrit :

Mathieu,
Tks
Pls NOTE MY SERIOUS OBJECTIONS to:
1.NOT MENTIONING REFERNCE TO THE APPROVAL OF CHARTERING ORGANIZATIONBS in HR
2. GIVE GIVE A BLANKET AGREEMENT TO THE DOCUMENTS WHICH YET TO BE DRAFTED.
3. Making so many changes to the Third proposals . We must avoid having a new proposal
Kavouss


2016-05-01 22:42 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>:
Dear colleagues, 

Please find below for your consideration some suggestions from our lawyers for clarification of the bylaw language regarding the Human rights FoI. This follows our request during the previous call. 

Best,

Mathieu Weill
---------------
Depuis mon mobile, désolé pour le style

Début du message transféré :

Expéditeur: "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory@sidley.com>
Date: 1 mai 2016 19:10:53 UTC+2
Destinataire: "'Mathieu Weill'" <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>, "'Thomas Rickert'" <thomas@rickert.net>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, "bylaws-coord@icann.org" <bylaws-coord@icann.org>
Cc: ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org>, "Rosemary E. Fei" <rfei@adlercolvin.com>, "ICANN@adlercolvin.com" <ICANN@adlercolvin.com>, Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com>, "Samantha.Eisner@icann.org" <Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>
Objet: Human Rights Transition Provision:  Bylaws Section 27.3(a)


Dear Co-Chairs and Bylaws Coordinating Group: 

On the CCWG call last week, there was a discussion of the Bylaws language regarding the transition provision on Human Rights [27.3(a)] and it was suggested that the language be clarified to ensure that the same approval process used for Work Stream 1 would apply.  We propose the following clarifying edits.  We suggest that you share this with the CCWG and if there is agreement, the following proposed edit should be included in the CCWG’s public comment:

Redline:

Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS

 

(a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall have no force or effect unless and until a framework of interpretation for human rights (“FOI-HR”) is approved by (i) approved for submission to the Board by the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2, and (ii) approved by each of the CCWG-Accountability’s chartering organizations and (iii) the Board, (in each the case of the Board, using the same process and criteria used by the Board to consider the as for Work Stream 1 Recommendations).

 

(b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN or the Board that occurred prior to the

effectiveness of the FOI-HR.

Clean:

Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS

 

(a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall have no force or effect unless and until a framework of interpretation for human rights (“FOI-HR”) is (i) approved for submission to the Board by the CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 and (ii) approved by the Board, in each case, using the same process and criteria as for Work Stream 1 Recommendations.

 

(b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN or the Board that occurred prior to the

effectiveness of the FOI-HR.

Kind regards,

 

Holly and Rosemary

 

 

HOLLY J. GREGORY
Partner and Co-Chair
Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group

Sidley Austin LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
+1 212 839 5853
holly.gregory@sidley.com
www.sidley.com

http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

 


 

****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community