Dear Chris,
As both ATRT exercises showed, as well as studies in between, one common and longstanding complaint is the lack of understanding by the community of the Boards positions and decsisons. They have always emphasized the need for a clearer (and independent) rationale of those positions and decision. You just confirmed the need for a better rationale again. Even if the question was not explicitly asked.
Wish you a nice Sunday
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
Hi Malcolm,The Board was not asked that question.
Cheers,
Chris
On 28 Sep 2015, at 02:16 , Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 27/09/2015 15:48, Nigel Roberts wrote:Unless the community give up the idea of ICANN having members (whether
one or seven billion) the Board will not agree a common proposal.
I wish I had been able to attend the face-to-face meeting.
Were the Board able to be any more clear as to why they insist on the
community giving up on the idea of having at least a single member?
--
Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd
21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
Company Registered in England No. 3137929
Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community