This looks like an excellent idea and solution to me. Provides real accountability without risk of upsetting the balance of things.

The only thing I'd be concerned about is writing the Nominating Committee into the next iteration of ICANN.

The Nomcom was a fudge to deal with concerns over directly elected board members. 

Over the years it has grown more and more anachronistic. Most recently it's own chair elect railed against how corrupt it had gotten. 

I would love to see us pull out the Nomcom while there is the opportunity to clean house.



Kieren

-
[sent through phone]


On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> wrote:

Very focused and clear, could be easily implemented.
Erika

Sent from my iPhone

> On 07 Apr 2015, at 06:24, Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
> FYI, ARIN has had an opportunity to take a looks at ICANN's Bylaws with legal feedback from its lawyers, which may be of an interest for legal subteam.
> This is just sharing it for your reference, simply some legal research work that ARIN sought & which may be useful for the CCWG's groups reference and not a recommendation.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Izumi
> <ARIN Memo on Proposed ICANN Bylaws Amendments.pdf>
> <ARIN Proposed Amendments for ICANN re Designators.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community