John, I may be wrong, but I think that perhaps ILO?
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of parminder
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 7:10 AM
To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results
On Saturday 17 December 2016 12:40 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
SNIPJohn Laprise's wording was much, much better:"What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to changing ICANN’s jurisdiction*, particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?"
This formulation does not include possibilities of jurisdictional immunity.
Something like
"What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to changing ICANN’s jurisdiction*, or providing possible jurisdictional immunity, particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?"
would be better.
parminder
_______________________________________________Accountability-Cross-Community mailing listAccountability-Cross-Community@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community