I would support this as well, for all the reasons stated.

Greg

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:


On 23/11/2015 23:14, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> MISSION, CORE VALUES
>
> Page 33: In the infamous "ICANN shall have no powers" section (those
> words since removed), I have been assured that there will be
> instructions to the lawyers so that the final crafted Bylaw will make it
> clear that for the purposes of this section, the identifiers themselves
> will be deemed not to be content. A footnote in the Annex would give me
> some comfort.

As I have said before, I have no problem with doing this.

In fact, please can we get on and do it, so we don't have to keep
hearing this request repeated!

--
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA


_______________________________________________
WP2 mailing list
WP2@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2