My point was quite the opposite to "trust us, we know what we're doing" :-)
If large changes were being made on this basis, then things could easily be slipped in.
The fact that most of the text is stable, that all changes are tracked, and that hundreds of people are looking at the documents, gives me great confidence that if any of the authors or rapporteurs or staff or cochair tried to pull something in that was not agreed text....
..... it would be caught, the perpetrator would be hung out to dry, and the group would be seriously disrupted.
So what I am really saying is, "this isn't as complex as it looks."
In my version of a perfect world, we would have had two months to deliver the work we have done since Paris. But we've discussed our disagreement about the schedule elsewhere.
J