Yep – sounds fair to me.

From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm@linx.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 2015 9:16 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
Cc: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] RV: A way to avoid the 'The Single Member Can Do Anything!' problem

On 4 Oct 2015, at 22:18, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:

>>  - the co-decision model, however, is useful - we have already proposed it for the change process for Fundamental Bylaws. I'd be much happier to explore whether that could be usefully explored for other powers.

Agreed.   I think you make a useful distinction.   I support both the Board and the community having a say in changing bylaws.   

The Board has the exclusive power of initiation for changes to the bylaws. I'd say that counts as a pretty significant say. 

Malcolm.