Too much process. Unnecessary voting. Over-involvement of entire community.


Kieren

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
+1 to this.

Subsidarity, please,. Each SO should decide how to remove it own directors, which, potentially could be any of the models I mentioned. It should merely be required to notify ICANN Board in a certain formal way when it has so determined to remove.



On 19/10/15 15:47, Jordan Carter wrote:
IN all of our work on decisions internal to an SO or, we have taken a
hands-off view - that the SO or AC itself should use the processes it uses.

If we need to move off that, we should decide that ASAP. And tell the
SOs/ACs.

Jordan

On 19 October 2015 at 15:27, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:


On 19/10/15 15:15, Chris Disspain wrote:


The relevant SO/AC then makes a decision. Removal of the Director
requires a 75% majority in the relevant SO/AC.


75% of what?

(a) All Council members?
(b) Council Members voting
(c) All SO Members?
(d) SO Members casting a vote


At least one of these would appear, in practice, to be unlikely in the
extreme to ever be triggered.



_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community




_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community