On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:


On 05/11/2015 19:59, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> I find this helpful. Well done.

So what we should be seeking to have confirmed is the Board's commitment that this CCWG may continue to exist for the purpose of developing plans and overseeing the implementation of WS2, and that the Board will continue to co-operate with the CCWG during that process.

I personally don't think the CCWG must be the team to carry out all the work set in WS2. If there are other ways to efficiently diversify and embed the activities in other community processes without distorting the task/objectives then that will be good. Certainly there are specification work that the CCWG should no doubt provide but it doesn't have to be CCWG that will develop the details(and CCWG could just perform general oversight). Unless the CCWG thinks that the community members(which i expect will again involve some of the current CCWG members) that would be involved in the other processes will not do a good job.

Regards

Malcolm.

--
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!