This is not merely a moving target, it is a transforming one.  That is not merely a slight deviation from the typical and inevitable ICANN moving target, it is a whole different kettle of fish.

Greg

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,

AOC reviews are always against a moving target.  ICANN generally does
not stop doing stuff during an AOC review.

avri

On 29-Jun-15 11:46, Greg Shatan wrote:
> 2. _Interplay between Accountability Work and AoC Reviews_:  The AoC
> reviews will be reviewing a moving target, as the work of the CWG and
> CCWG changes ICANN.  The AoC itself may disappear (subsumed in large
> part into the bylaws) before the AoC reviews are completed.  New
> bylaws, processes and structures will make it difficult to review
> ICANN in midstream -- are these reviews of ICANN before, during or
> after IANA/Accountability changes -- or all 3?  Of course, this would
> need to be worked out with NTIA, not declared unilaterally (but I
> don't think anyone was suggesting that).  In any event, we are best
> placed to consider the interplay between our work and the AoC reviews.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community