I believe we need the CCWG's outside counsel to draft the bylaws (not ICANN legal).  ICANN legal can review and make suggested revisions as others can, however I believe it is important the actual drafting be done by CCWG's independent counsel who specializes in California nonprofit law.  

Thanks,
Robin


On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:38 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:

Dear all

My humble apologies for the meeting - I am stuck in a staff function that clashes and cannot join.

Please find below a couple of thoughts re agenda items:

On 29 June 2015 at 22:45, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,

Below you will find a proposed agenda  in preparation for your call #38 - Tuesday, 30 June – 06:00 - 08:00 UTC (time converter here): 

1. Welcome, Roll Call & SoI 
2. Action items from Buenos Aires (see below) 
  • Independent counsel will review both the empowered SO/AC membership model and the empowered SO/AC designator model in order to inform the discussion that will take place in Paris; 
Look forward to seeing this report, and would add that besides members and designators, if there are any other models under the legislation, those could be looked at too? 
  • Take into account the drastic constraints on timeline and the requirement for minimal changes, a work party will be constituted to address the "emerging" issues outlined in the "discussion starters" papers;
Support the formation of this WP as attached and below, do not want to volunteer; 
  • Rapporteurs to organize work on WP1 & WP2 issues that need further discussion and are not dependent on the Model discussion;
Will send a note to WP1 seeking to set out this work plan tomorrow after debrief call following this one - and look forward to hearing what is discussed on the call in item 3 below as input. 
  • CoChairs to coordinate with ICG and CWG to prepare a response to the NTIA letter;
  • Bylaw drafting process to be discussed on the list and considered at the next CCWG meeting; 
  • WPs to make sure all comments in the public comment tool have responses for publication, no later than publication of PC2; 
  • Rapporteurs to coordinate work in respective WPs.
3. Review of CCWG scorecard (see attached)

No particular comments - the scorecard looks largely accurate to me.
 

4. Emerging issues : WP3 terms of reference, scoping & call for volunteers (see attached)
5. Bylaw drafting process (see attached)

My personal view is that I do not mind whether ICANN legal or our counsel initiate the drafting based on requirements. I trust our counsel and us as a group to pick up any issues with drafts no matter where they come from. 


Best wishes for a great meeting.

cheers,
Jordan

 

6. A.O.B
7. Closing remarks 

Thanks

Best regards

Alice 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community




--
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community