El 12/04/2016, a las 8:51 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> escribió:Dear LeonTksHaving no traction was due to lineup ?pre arrangement of those talked against meOthers had no commentsRegardsKavouss2016-04-12 15:40 GMT+02:00 León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>:Dear Kavouss,
I am sorry you feel that way. As you know, our duty as Co-Chairs is to try to facilitate the discussion amongst all members and participants in our group.
I am aware that you have expressed your disagreement with Mr. Shatan’s views in several occasions but I am also aware that, to the best of my knowledge, your disagreement has found no traction in the discussion in the meeting you are referring to, hence I thought the best way to foster and encourage discussion on the issue was to take it to the list.
I apologize if my suggestion offended you or if it was perceived as being disrespectful. Of course I didn’t mean it that way at all.
I trust you will understand why I suggested to take the discussion to the list and thank you for your kind observation.
Best regards,
León
> El 12/04/2016, a las 6:54 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> escribió:
>
> Dear Leon
> I am disappointed and frustrated by the reaction of some Co-Chairs in conducting the meeting .
> I had a disagreement with Mr. Satan of IPC on the above subject
> Due to the closed link between that person and other persons belonging to the same camp, you did not agreed with the argument that I submitted .
> Mr.Satan and his camp , wrong views were taken BUT what disturbed me more was your statement in saying" kavouss,if you want to continue thus discussion,continue on nailing list"
> Why should I do that?
> What was the usefulness of the meeting if an important issue should be discussed outside the call?
> Why I was treated ?
> .
> Kavousd
> Sent from my iPhone