Blog: Updating our Community on our Review of the CCWG-Accountability Proposal
Original link: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/updating-our-community-on-our-review-of-the- ccwg-accountability-proposal The Board is deeply engaged in reviewing the CCWG-Accountability proposal and has actively participated in the process. Consistent with our commitment to transparency, we would like to share with the Community the steps in our review process. Last week, the ICANN Board submitted a preliminary set of comments <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00006. html> to the CCWG-Accountability Public Comment forum. The Board remains committed to engaging and working with the CCWG on solutions to address concerns raised in its preliminary set of comments. A subset of ICANN Board Members and Staff Members have been meeting in Washington, DC on Tuesday and Wednesday this week to further consider the CCWG proposal and commence a review of an impact analysis from ICANN's external counsel. As part of this meeting, the group held a call together with the CCWG Chairs. For full transparency and to clarify the basis for the review points and comments,ICANN will share the impact analysis and publish it in the CCWG Public Comment forum. The Board welcomes feedback from the CCWG on the impact analysis as it finalizes its responses to the CCWG proposal in the Public Comment forum. Next week, consistent with the CCWG request, the Board will have an open teleconference with the CCWG to help inform the Board's development of its comments to be submitted into the Public Comment forum before the close of the comment period on 12 September. Call details will be announced so that anyone in the community may participate. Finally, in light of the importance of these discussions, we propose that the CCWG-Accountability hold a public meeting in Los Angeles in late September to continue the dialogue with the Board on the CCWG proposal. As part of the ICANN community, we will continue to work constructively to help the CCWG finalize the proposal to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship transition and an ICANN with enhanced accountability. We remain appreciative of the CCWG's valuable work.
Dear Grace, Thank you vbery much for the message. CCWG needs to consider. 1. The need for physical meeting in LA, together with its timing probably 23-24 September, if CCWG AGREE 2. Before the issue is discussed with Board, it seems premature to have public meeting as there must be some exchange of views and opinion that should be first discussed between CCWG and the Board which ,in any case, would be VIRTUALLY public . The matter needs to be discussed by CCWG at its next call and the Board should formally ask for such arrangements, unless CCWG, the message just received from Bruce as reflecting the Board's view and NOT only one Board member. We need to work properly ,efficiently and formall In fact I( KAVOUSSARASTEH)proposed a virtual meeting with Board as soon as we received clarifications which are being sought by CCWG Regards Kavouss . 2015-08-26 21:10 GMT+02:00 Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org>:
Original link: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/updating-our-community-on-our-review-of-the-...
The Board is deeply engaged in reviewing the CCWG-Accountability proposal and has actively participated in the process. Consistent with our commitment to transparency, we would like to share with the Community the steps in our review process.
Last week, the ICANN Board submitted a preliminary set of comments <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00006.h...> to the CCWG-Accountability Public Comment forum. The Board remains committed to engaging and working with the CCWG on solutions to address concerns raised in its preliminary set of comments.
A subset of ICANN Board Members and Staff Members have been meeting in Washington, DC on Tuesday and Wednesday this week to further consider the CCWG proposal and commence a review of an impact analysis from ICANN's external counsel. As part of this meeting, the group held a call together with the CCWG Chairs. For full transparency and to clarify the basis for the review points and comments,ICANN will share the impact analysis and publish it in the CCWG Public Comment forum. The Board welcomes feedback from the CCWG on the impact analysis as it finalizes its responses to the CCWG proposal in the Public Comment forum.
Next week, consistent with the CCWG request, the Board will have an open teleconference with the CCWG to help inform the Board's development of its comments to be submitted into the Public Comment forum before the close of the comment period on 12 September. Call details will be announced so that anyone in the community may participate.
Finally, in light of the importance of these discussions, we propose that the CCWG-Accountability hold a public meeting in Los Angeles in late September to continue the dialogue with the Board on the CCWG proposal.
As part of the ICANN community, we will continue to work constructively to help the CCWG finalize the proposal to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship transition and an ICANN with enhanced accountability. We remain appreciative of the CCWG's valuable work.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Hello Kavouss, On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
.......... unless CCWG, the message just received from Bruce as reflecting the Board's view and NOT only one Board member.
Item 8 from Bruce mail says: "The Board is offering the opportunity for the CCWG......" i guess that implies its the voice of the board and not of Bruce alone. We need to work properly ,efficiently and formall
In fact I( KAVOUSSARASTEH)proposed a virtual meeting with Board as soon as we received clarifications which are being sought by CCWG
Item 4 to 6 of Bruce mail seem to address your vital comment above. Overall depending on how those virtual calls go, there may be no more major item to discuss physically. Nevertheless, i think it may be good for the CCWG to consider having the physical meeting penned down tentatively just in case. Regards
Regards Kavouss .
2015-08-26 21:10 GMT+02:00 Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org>:
Original link: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/updating-our-community-on-our-review-of-the-...
The Board is deeply engaged in reviewing the CCWG-Accountability proposal and has actively participated in the process. Consistent with our commitment to transparency, we would like to share with the Community the steps in our review process.
Last week, the ICANN Board submitted a preliminary set of comments <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00006.h...> to the CCWG-Accountability Public Comment forum. The Board remains committed to engaging and working with the CCWG on solutions to address concerns raised in its preliminary set of comments.
A subset of ICANN Board Members and Staff Members have been meeting in Washington, DC on Tuesday and Wednesday this week to further consider the CCWG proposal and commence a review of an impact analysis from ICANN's external counsel. As part of this meeting, the group held a call together with the CCWG Chairs. For full transparency and to clarify the basis for the review points and comments,ICANN will share the impact analysis and publish it in the CCWG Public Comment forum. The Board welcomes feedback from the CCWG on the impact analysis as it finalizes its responses to the CCWG proposal in the Public Comment forum.
Next week, consistent with the CCWG request, the Board will have an open teleconference with the CCWG to help inform the Board's development of its comments to be submitted into the Public Comment forum before the close of the comment period on 12 September. Call details will be announced so that anyone in the community may participate.
Finally, in light of the importance of these discussions, we propose that the CCWG-Accountability hold a public meeting in Los Angeles in late September to continue the dialogue with the Board on the CCWG proposal.
As part of the ICANN community, we will continue to work constructively to help the CCWG finalize the proposal to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship transition and an ICANN with enhanced accountability. We remain appreciative of the CCWG's valuable work.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !
participants (3)
-
Grace Abuhamad -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Seun Ojedeji