Dear Co-Chairs, The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline? Thanks! Greg
Grec+1 KAVOUSS 2016-01-11 21:09 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs,
The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline?
Thanks!
Greg
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
good point! Jorge Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 11.01.2016 um 21:23 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>>: Grec+1 KAVOUSS 2016-01-11 21:09 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>>: Dear Co-Chairs, The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline? Thanks! Greg _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Greg, all, we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all recommendations with our group. Best, Thomas --- rickert.net
Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs,
The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline?
Thanks!
Greg <CCWG Timeline.pdf> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Did we not receive feedback from all Chartering organisations to the Third Public Comment? Did I miss some that you are expecting? Or by "feedback" do you mean final endorsement of our paper? I do not think you will get that before we indicate that we have stopped making changes to it. Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
On 11 Jan 2016, at 21:14, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Greg, all, we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all recommendations with our group.
Best, Thomas
--- rickert.net
Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs,
The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline?
Thanks!
Greg <CCWG Timeline.pdf> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Malcolm, I don't believe that feedback from the GNSO regarding the Third Draft Proposal has been received yet (although feedback from various stakeholder groups and constituencies has been received as part of the public comment process). That said, I don't think that should hold up revision of the timeline. Greg On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
Did we not receive feedback from all Chartering organisations to the Third Public Comment? Did I miss some that you are expecting?
Or by "feedback" do you mean final endorsement of our paper? I do not think you will get that before we indicate that we have stopped making changes to it.
Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
On 11 Jan 2016, at 21:14, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Greg, all, we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all recommendations with our group.
Best, Thomas
--- rickert.net
Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs,
The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline?
Thanks!
Greg
<CCWG Timeline.pdf>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
I also had imagined that the pending GNSO response should not hold up the timeline, but the Co-Chairs indicated that the extent/level of the comment from GNSO could affect the timeline. I think the rationale makes sense and its just few days to when that last bit of comment would come in(which I believe is 14th). That said, it may be good to start getting some draft timeline up for discussion pending finalisation when the GNSO comment is received. Regards Regards On 12 Jan 2016 7:20 p.m., "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Malcolm,
I don't believe that feedback from the GNSO regarding the Third Draft Proposal has been received yet (although feedback from various stakeholder groups and constituencies has been received as part of the public comment process).
That said, I don't think that should hold up revision of the timeline.
Greg
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
Did we not receive feedback from all Chartering organisations to the Third Public Comment? Did I miss some that you are expecting?
Or by "feedback" do you mean final endorsement of our paper? I do not think you will get that before we indicate that we have stopped making changes to it.
Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
On 11 Jan 2016, at 21:14, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Greg, all, we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all recommendations with our group.
Best, Thomas
--- rickert.net
Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs,
The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline?
Thanks!
Greg
<CCWG Timeline.pdf>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
All, On the timeline my feeling is that we need to do the work we are doing now on the 12 recommendations this month, and crystallise either a supplementary proposal or a fourth draft. In order to do that, we do need the input from COs - with GNSO coming and I hope ccNSO able to do so too, as well as GAC. Without that feedback, we don't know what the parameters are for finalising the next step. After that, there will obviously need to be a chance for the COs to sign off. In retrospect, we should have taken the Board's action in the second public comment period as a sign and extended the timeframe further for this phase. But hindsight is something you only have after the fact, right? :-) best Jordan On 13 January 2016 at 08:36, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
I also had imagined that the pending GNSO response should not hold up the timeline, but the Co-Chairs indicated that the extent/level of the comment from GNSO could affect the timeline.
I think the rationale makes sense and its just few days to when that last bit of comment would come in(which I believe is 14th). That said, it may be good to start getting some draft timeline up for discussion pending finalisation when the GNSO comment is received.
Regards
Regards On 12 Jan 2016 7:20 p.m., "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Malcolm,
I don't believe that feedback from the GNSO regarding the Third Draft Proposal has been received yet (although feedback from various stakeholder groups and constituencies has been received as part of the public comment process).
That said, I don't think that should hold up revision of the timeline.
Greg
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
Did we not receive feedback from all Chartering organisations to the Third Public Comment? Did I miss some that you are expecting?
Or by "feedback" do you mean final endorsement of our paper? I do not think you will get that before we indicate that we have stopped making changes to it.
Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
On 11 Jan 2016, at 21:14, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Greg, all, we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all recommendations with our group.
Best, Thomas
--- rickert.net
Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs,
The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline?
Thanks!
Greg
<CCWG Timeline.pdf>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob) Email: jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter Web: www.internetnz.nz *A better world through a better Internet *
Dear Thomas, Greg, all, Thanks for bringing up this issue. Given that the Chartering Organizations have not been provided with a revised proposal on January 7th as originally planned, I expect that the new timeline will foresee a new COs evaluation period (probably in February?) once the revised CCWG proposal is published. Kind regards, Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI) Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil T: + 55 61 2030-6609 Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva Division of Information Society (DI) Ministry of External Relations - Brazil T: + 55 61 2030-6609 -----Mensagem original----- De: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] Em nome de Thomas Rickert Enviada em: segunda-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2016 19:15 Para: Greg Shatan Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Assunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Timeline? Greg, all, we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all recommendations with our group. Best, Thomas --- rickert.net Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>: Dear Co-Chairs, The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here. As far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule. What is our new timeline? Thanks! Greg <CCWG Timeline.pdf> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
participants (8)
-
Greg Shatan -
Jordan Carter -
Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Malcolm Hutty -
Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva -
Seun Ojedeji -
Thomas Rickert