All, please find below a summary of the proposed steps kindly sent by Bruce Tonkin. Best, Thomas
Hello Mathieu, Thomas and León,
Thanks for joining the call today at short notice.
Here is my summary of next based on what I heard on the call:
(1) ICANN will post a blog with an update on the work the Board is doing to produce its public comments on the last CCWG proposal
(2) ICANN will post the advice it has received from its external counsel - Jones Day. The Board does not endorse this advice - but is simply posting it so that we are transparent about information we have received.
(4) The ICANN Board will hold a 90 min call with the CCWG for the CCWG to brief the Board on its proposal, and also provide an opportunity for members of the CCWG to respond to the Jones Day advice
(5) The ICANN Board will then hold a separate call - e.g. 3 hours - to share its current feedback on the proposal. The particular focus will be on which aspects of the proposal that in the Board's opinion are sufficiently defined for implementation via bylaws changes etc, and those parts of the proposal that in the Board's opinion have some gaps that require further detail before they can be implemented in full via the bylaws etc and should be handled in work stream 2. As part of potentially moving some further work to work stream 2, the Board will also share some ideas of what could be included in work stream 1 (e.g some additional bylaws language) that provide a bridge to the changes envisaged in work stream 2. E.g. some of the items in work stream 2 could be partially implemented in bylaws changes as part of work stream 1.
(6) There will also be an opportunity for a follow up 3 hours call if needed.
(7) The Board will post its final comments in writing in the public comment forum, that will take into account any feedback received from the calls with the CCWG.
(8) The Board is offering the opportunity for the CCWG to meet with the Board face-to-face on 23-24 Sept in Los Angeles if the CCWG feels that would be useful to their work. Most Board members will be able to attend face-to-face as they will be travelling to Los Angeles for meetings for the CEO search (25 Sept) and also a Board workshop (26-28 Sept) that we hold between ICANN meetings.
The ICANN staff will confirm dates and times for the various meetings above.
It would be helpful if we receive an early indication of interest of a face-ot-face meeting so both Board members and the CCWG members can make travel plans.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Hi Thomas, Thanks for sharing this update, this is very useful engagement from board and most importantly its quite timely this time around. I congratulate the board for this huge progress and manner of approach Regards On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
All, please find below a summary of the proposed steps kindly sent by Bruce Tonkin.
Best, Thomas
Hello Mathieu, Thomas and León,
Thanks for joining the call today at short notice.
Here is my summary of next based on what I heard on the call:
(1) ICANN will post a blog with an update on the work the Board is doing
to produce its public comments on the last CCWG proposal
(2) ICANN will post the advice it has received from its external counsel
- Jones Day. The Board does not endorse this advice - but is simply posting it so that we are transparent about information we have received.
(4) The ICANN Board will hold a 90 min call with the CCWG for the CCWG
to brief the Board on its proposal, and also provide an opportunity for members of the CCWG to respond to the Jones Day advice
(5) The ICANN Board will then hold a separate call - e.g. 3 hours - to
share its current feedback on the proposal. The particular focus will be on which aspects of the proposal that in the Board's opinion are sufficiently defined for implementation via bylaws changes etc, and those parts of the proposal that in the Board's opinion have some gaps that require further detail before they can be implemented in full via the bylaws etc and should be handled in work stream 2. As part of potentially moving some further work to work stream 2, the Board will also share some ideas of what could be included in work stream 1 (e.g some additional bylaws language) that provide a bridge to the changes envisaged in work stream 2. E.g. some of the items in work stream 2 could be partially implemented in bylaws changes as part of work stream 1.
(6) There will also be an opportunity for a follow up 3 hours call if
needed.
(7) The Board will post its final comments in writing in the public
comment forum, that will take into account any feedback received from the calls with the CCWG.
(8) The Board is offering the opportunity for the CCWG to meet with the
Board face-to-face on 23-24 Sept in Los Angeles if the CCWG feels that would be useful to their work. Most Board members will be able to attend face-to-face as they will be travelling to Los Angeles for meetings for the CEO search (25 Sept) and also a Board workshop (26-28 Sept) that we hold between ICANN meetings.
The ICANN staff will confirm dates and times for the various meetings
above.
It would be helpful if we receive an early indication of interest of a
face-ot-face meeting so both Board members and the CCWG members can make travel plans.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !
Hi Bruce, Hi Dear Co-Chairs, Your message was cvarefully examined and nots.The content os message seems to me reasonable, positive and constructive. Unfortunately ,I have already booked my ticket ,as ICG MEMBER, FOR la, You everybody in CCWG , AGREE with the proposed dates of 23-24 September, ICANN should agree with the modification of my return Geneva, FFM/LA / FFM / Geneva,,I have no problem to do so. We have decided in CCWG that the Co-Chair will write you regarding your comments. further written clarifications are pre-requisite of any Face-to Face and Virtual meeting ,in order that those clarifications are examined and discussed in CCWG prior to any meeting Regards Kavouss m Regards 2015-08-26 21:30 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for sharing this update, this is very useful engagement from board and most importantly its quite timely this time around. I congratulate the board for this huge progress and manner of approach
Regards
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
All, please find below a summary of the proposed steps kindly sent by Bruce Tonkin.
Best, Thomas
Hello Mathieu, Thomas and León,
Thanks for joining the call today at short notice.
Here is my summary of next based on what I heard on the call:
(1) ICANN will post a blog with an update on the work the Board is
doing to produce its public comments on the last CCWG proposal
(2) ICANN will post the advice it has received from its external
counsel - Jones Day. The Board does not endorse this advice - but is simply posting it so that we are transparent about information we have received.
(4) The ICANN Board will hold a 90 min call with the CCWG for the CCWG
to brief the Board on its proposal, and also provide an opportunity for members of the CCWG to respond to the Jones Day advice
(5) The ICANN Board will then hold a separate call - e.g. 3 hours - to
share its current feedback on the proposal. The particular focus will be on which aspects of the proposal that in the Board's opinion are sufficiently defined for implementation via bylaws changes etc, and those parts of the proposal that in the Board's opinion have some gaps that require further detail before they can be implemented in full via the bylaws etc and should be handled in work stream 2. As part of potentially moving some further work to work stream 2, the Board will also share some ideas of what could be included in work stream 1 (e.g some additional bylaws language) that provide a bridge to the changes envisaged in work stream 2. E.g. some of the items in work stream 2 could be partially implemented in bylaws changes as part of work stream 1.
(6) There will also be an opportunity for a follow up 3 hours call if
needed.
(7) The Board will post its final comments in writing in the public
comment forum, that will take into account any feedback received from the calls with the CCWG.
(8) The Board is offering the opportunity for the CCWG to meet with the
Board face-to-face on 23-24 Sept in Los Angeles if the CCWG feels that would be useful to their work. Most Board members will be able to attend face-to-face as they will be travelling to Los Angeles for meetings for the CEO search (25 Sept) and also a Board workshop (26-28 Sept) that we hold between ICANN meetings.
The ICANN staff will confirm dates and times for the various meetings
above.
It would be helpful if we receive an early indication of interest of a
face-ot-face meeting so both Board members and the CCWG members can make travel plans.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>*
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Dear Co-Chairs, I agree with Mr Arasteh with regards to the timing for the proposed Board encounter. This is in the middle of the week and short notice and extremely inconvenient for individuals who have to work for a living. greetings, el On 2015-08-26 21:30 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Hi Bruce, Hi Dear Co-Chairs, Your message was cvarefully examined and nots.The content os message seems to me reasonable, positive and constructive. Unfortunately ,I have already booked my ticket ,as ICG MEMBER, FOR la, You everybody in CCWG , AGREE with the proposed dates of 23-24 September, ICANN should agree with the modification of my return Geneva, FFM/LA / FFM / Geneva,,I have no problem to do so. We have decided in CCWG that the Co-Chair will write you regarding your comments. further written clarifications are pre-requisite of any Face-to Face and Virtual meeting ,in order that those clarifications are examined and discussed in CCWG prior to any meeting Regards Kavouss m Regards
2015-08-26 21:30 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com <mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>>:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for sharing this update, this is very useful engagement from board and most importantly its quite timely this time around. I congratulate the board for this huge progress and manner of approach
Regards
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de <mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de>> wrote:
All, please find below a summary of the proposed steps kindly sent by Bruce Tonkin.
Best, Thomas
> > Hello Mathieu, Thomas and León, > > Thanks for joining the call today at short notice. > > Here is my summary of next based on what I heard on the call: > > (1) ICANN will post a blog with an update on the work the Board is doing to produce its public comments on the last CCWG proposal > > (2) ICANN will post the advice it has received from its external counsel - Jones Day. The Board does not endorse this advice - but is simply posting it so that we are transparent about information we have received. > > (4) The ICANN Board will hold a 90 min call with the CCWG for the CCWG to brief the Board on its proposal, and also provide an opportunity for members of the CCWG to respond to the Jones Day advice > > (5) The ICANN Board will then hold a separate call - e.g. 3 hours - to share its current feedback on the proposal. The particular focus will be on which aspects of the proposal that in the Board's opinion are sufficiently defined for implementation via bylaws changes etc, and those parts of the proposal that in the Board's opinion have some gaps that require further detail before they can be implemented in full via the bylaws etc and should be handled in work stream 2. As part of potentially moving some further work to work stream 2, the Board will also share some ideas of what could be included in work stream 1 (e.g some additional bylaws language) that provide a bridge to the changes envisaged in work stream 2. E.g. some of the items in work stream 2 could be partially implemented in bylaws changes as part of work stream 1. > > (6) There will also be an opportunity for a follow up 3 hours call if needed. > > (7) The Board will post its final comments in writing in the public comment forum, that will take into account any feedback received from the calls with the CCWG. > > (8) The Board is offering the opportunity for the CCWG to meet with the Board face-to-face on 23-24 Sept in Los Angeles if the CCWG feels that would be useful to their work. Most Board members will be able to attend face-to-face as they will be travelling to Los Angeles for meetings for the CEO search (25 Sept) and also a Board workshop (26-28 Sept) that we hold between ICANN meetings. > > The ICANN staff will confirm dates and times for the various meetings above. > > It would be helpful if we receive an early indication of interest of a face-ot-face meeting so both Board members and the CCWG members can make travel plans. > > Regards, > Bruce Tonkin > > > >
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
/Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng Mobile: +2348035233535 //alt email:<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>/
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Come to think about it, why don't we have this engagement with the Boar during our F2F ion the Friday before the ICANN meeting? el On 2015-08-26 21:36, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Dear Co-Chairs,
I agree with Mr Arasteh with regards to the timing for the proposed Board encounter.
This is in the middle of the week and short notice and extremely inconvenient for individuals who have to work for a living.
greetings, el [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
participants (4)
-
Dr Eberhard W Lisse -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Seun Ojedeji -
Thomas Rickert