Report to Council in terms of CCWG Charter
Byron, please bring the below to the attention of Council members, as I can not post to the Council List In terms of the Charter I wish request an opportunity to discuss with the Chair of the chartering organization or your designated representatives that the Co-Chairs of the CCWG Accountability have decided to declare the Face to Face Meeting here in Paris TWO meetings, in order to be able to read issues on which there is consensus in the room, twice. I have raised in the room (and had on the mailing list while in transit) because 1) it was sprung on us by the Co-Chairs late, while most attending where in fact in transit instead of being decided by the members in two readings (well) in advance; and 2) it is an unheard of attempt at circumventing the two reading rule; and 3) the call for this F2F was short notice when many members already had made other arrangements, such as vacation; some of them now being represented by individuals not having previously participated in the CCWG, I for one do not even know the ccNSO alternate Maarten Simon. There are however at least 23 members and/or alternates present in the room as I write this. I objected against it for the record, as the sole objector. greetings, el
Somehow this did not make it to the CCWG List. el On 2015-07-17 09:22 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Byron,
please bring the below to the attention of Council members, as I can not post to the Council List
In terms of the Charter I wish request an opportunity to discuss with the Chair of the chartering organization or your designated representatives that the Co-Chairs of the CCWG Accountability have decided to declare the Face to Face Meeting here in Paris TWO meetings, in order to be able to read issues on which there is consensus in the room, twice.
I have raised in the room (and had on the mailing list while in transit) because
1) it was sprung on us by the Co-Chairs late, while most attending where in fact in transit instead of being decided by the members in two readings (well) in advance; and
2) it is an unheard of attempt at circumventing the two reading rule; and
3) the call for this F2F was short notice when many members already had made other arrangements, such as vacation; some of them now being represented by individuals not having previously participated in the CCWG, I for one do not even know the ccNSO alternate Maarten Simon.
There are however at least 23 members and/or alternates present in the room as I write this.
I objected against it for the record, as the sole objector.
greetings, el
Dear Eberhard, I believe it did go through to the CCWG list. I can confirm I received it in your first attempt. Best regards, León
El 17/07/2015, a las 10:03, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> escribió:
Somehow this did not make it to the CCWG List.
el
On 2015-07-17 09:22 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Byron,
please bring the below to the attention of Council members, as I can not post to the Council List
In terms of the Charter I wish request an opportunity to discuss with the Chair of the chartering organization or your designated representatives that the Co-Chairs of the CCWG Accountability have decided to declare the Face to Face Meeting here in Paris TWO meetings, in order to be able to read issues on which there is consensus in the room, twice.
I have raised in the room (and had on the mailing list while in transit) because
1) it was sprung on us by the Co-Chairs late, while most attending where in fact in transit instead of being decided by the members in two readings (well) in advance; and
2) it is an unheard of attempt at circumventing the two reading rule; and
3) the call for this F2F was short notice when many members already had made other arrangements, such as vacation; some of them now being represented by individuals not having previously participated in the CCWG, I for one do not even know the ccNSO alternate Maarten Simon.
There are however at least 23 members and/or alternates present in the room as I write this.
I objected against it for the record, as the sole objector.
greetings, el
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thank you, I just noted that a subsequent message of mine made it, but didn't get this one. I want to make it very clear that did not mean to imply anything. Sometimes technology gets the better of us :-)-O el On 2015-07-17 10:08 , León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
Dear Eberhard,
I believe it did go through to the CCWG list. I can confirm I received it in your first attempt.
Best regards,
León [...] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIVAwUBVai5F5cFHaN5RT+rAQIiiQ/9EKd/8STocVMY7MRShq3J0cnF0H+lWHkK 4mECdhTsotpMTvT1iCtXSGih4WWEfFsW7br7MRJ0WwSm19y4WcEYVE8CZKjFW2DY StHidtRbt5Vfcw5xocpa95UxsFsdMNvC5Zx0ONLjmgHnCVhhPwe0Irj36uwHMcV6 RDMNwMmJroOT7WCwdfwvbeBiKFseuiM8S+nxXE9DAH5ufNbEFLKbMBwwB5+VGwgr LIFQx+cWImqWkzhTlDIw1lAYadsgSd8oSAZOUYxCJV6mK1JMtw0LcswiAmnYth/8 Vrrub/x7V/yslZ+PFfjYcSk+IMHhNXyhFrswzLB075645UjwfyEdQb2122cPi39Z MscBCO44JN6Bv+MjSBrDJftCoRZXY5yLMGL+GOvnY2uN883udTRB5fQCi1Uc++D1 +J0W+TXYQvUmYuX+YMcqNwiwYK+O2Qz5tO/bVfatiVM2eIt8PZdqLF7AhkWmYM8a rtu9EvhlP0Bev5bb039euL1/GzP3wQk4iWylMrAZ25wsVwk/LePqigUCkfkNCDJ+ WFDY+kUEYdDvXXr/mCdRZTVuaApC+8sR9MDT2i9mkhBkcUEkws+Fj+zwA76BFWXr jbJWTXz++6S9IKbc75K2qvs2OvU9m6/B8BTPJI8bMNM/LyothqxWJRYNhhsJJbu4 YZ+S0gkaL0w= =uP7E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+1 I received the initial mail . -James
On 17 Jul 2015, at 10:08, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:
Dear Eberhard,
I believe it did go through to the CCWG list. I can confirm I received it in your first attempt.
Best regards,
León
El 17/07/2015, a las 10:03, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> escribió:
Somehow this did not make it to the CCWG List.
el
On 2015-07-17 09:22 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Byron,
please bring the below to the attention of Council members, as I can not post to the Council List
In terms of the Charter I wish request an opportunity to discuss with the Chair of the chartering organization or your designated representatives that the Co-Chairs of the CCWG Accountability have decided to declare the Face to Face Meeting here in Paris TWO meetings, in order to be able to read issues on which there is consensus in the room, twice.
I have raised in the room (and had on the mailing list while in transit) because
1) it was sprung on us by the Co-Chairs late, while most attending where in fact in transit instead of being decided by the members in two readings (well) in advance; and
2) it is an unheard of attempt at circumventing the two reading rule; and
3) the call for this F2F was short notice when many members already had made other arrangements, such as vacation; some of them now being represented by individuals not having previously participated in the CCWG, I for one do not even know the ccNSO alternate Maarten Simon.
There are however at least 23 members and/or alternates present in the room as I write this.
I objected against it for the record, as the sole objector.
greetings, el
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
participants (3)
-
Dr Eberhard W Lisse -
James Gannon -
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía