Olga May I ask, is the only difference between this and the earlier version the addition of Portugal to the list, or is there a further substantive change such that I need to go back and read it for comparison? Thanks Paul Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 Link to my PGP Key <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...> <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=ema...> From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:40 AM To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Cc: Cavalli Olga del Carmen <occ@mrecic.gov.ar>; Denis Gonzalez Grandjean <dgonzalezg@subtel.gob.cl>; acct-staff@icann.org; Jose Clastornik <jose.clastornik@agesic.gub.uy>; milagros_castanon@hotmail.com; María Milagros Castañon Seoane <mcastanon@rree.gob.pe>; Jose Clastornik <jclastor@hg.com.uy>; Nicolas Caballero <nicustkd@gmail.com>; Jesus Rivera <jrivera@conatel.gob.ve>; Ana Neves <Ana.Neves@fct.pt>; J Rivera <jrrp72@gmail.com>; Denis Gonzalez Grandjean <denis.gonzalez.g@gmail.com>; alejandra.erramuspe@agesic.gub.uy Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Updated Minority Statement for the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations Dear Co-chairs, As a member of the CCWG on Accountability appointed by the GAC, and on behalf of the governments of: Argentina Brazil Chile France Paraguay Peru Portugal Uruguay Venezuela I am submitting an updated verision of the Minority Statement which I sent yesterday. Please consider the document attached to this email as the new updated version, which replaces the previous one. I have also attached a pdf version. Please confirm the reception of this message and its attached documents. If you have any doubts please let me know. Best regards Olga Cavalli Argentina GAC Representative GAC Vicechair

Does this constitute an objection? My understanding is that only objections can be accompanied by a minority opinion. As the GAC works by consensus, I assume t means the GAC objects. Given Ms Gross Minority statement It follows she objects. I have objected formally as well and have sent a Minority Statement. Can the Co-Chairs please declare non-consensus so we can all get on with our lives? Not only would it be cost saving... el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6s On 18 Feb 2016, 18:40 +0200, Olga Cavalli<olgacavalli@gmail.com>, wrote:

Dear Co-chairs,

As a member of the CCWG on Accountability appointed by the GAC, and on behalf of the governments of:

Argentina Brazil Chile France Paraguay Peru Portugal Uruguay Venezuela

I am submitting an updated verision of the Minority Statement which I sent yesterday.

Please consider the document attached to this email as the new updated version, which replaces the previous one. I have also attached a pdf version.

Please confirm the reception of this message and its attached documents.

If you have any doubts please let me know.

Best regards

Olga Cavalli Argentina GAC Representative GAC Vicechair

_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community