Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin
I note back in February we did state: " ICANN is expecting to receive both proposals at roughly the same time." I would assume it is still preferable if the two proposals are submitted together. I know we are all still hoping to complete the CCWG work soon. I guess if after Dublin it is clear that the work will take longer, than we could certainly issue an updated statement on timing. My assumption is that the community generally would prefer that both proposals be submitted to NTIA together rather than sending one this year, and another some months later? Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Hasn't NTIA stated that it will only accept a complete 2-part package? That's my understanding. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW. Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VLawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey Original Message From: Bruce Tonkin Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:12 PM To: 'Accountability Cross Community' Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin I note back in February we did state: " ICANN is expecting to receive both proposals at roughly the same time." I would assume it is still preferable if the two proposals are submitted together. I know we are all still hoping to complete the CCWG work soon. I guess if after Dublin it is clear that the work will take longer, than we could certainly issue an updated statement on timing. My assumption is that the community generally would prefer that both proposals be submitted to NTIA together rather than sending one this year, and another some months later? Regards, Bruce Tonkin _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4435/10780 - Release Date: 10/08/15
Mine as well. In which case, in my view it makes most sense to provide the two parts together. Regards Bruce Tonkin -----Original Message----- From: Phil Corwin [mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com] Sent: Saturday, 10 October 2015 2:03 PM To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; 'Accountability Cross Community' <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin Hasn't NTIA stated that it will only accept a complete 2-part package? That's my understanding. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW. Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VLawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey Original Message From: Bruce Tonkin Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:12 PM To: 'Accountability Cross Community' Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin I note back in February we did state: " ICANN is expecting to receive both proposals at roughly the same time." I would assume it is still preferable if the two proposals are submitted together. I know we are all still hoping to complete the CCWG work soon. I guess if after Dublin it is clear that the work will take longer, than we could certainly issue an updated statement on timing. My assumption is that the community generally would prefer that both proposals be submitted to NTIA together rather than sending one this year, and another some months later? Regards, Bruce Tonkin _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4435/10780 - Release Date: 10/08/15
participants (2)
-
Bruce Tonkin -
Phil Corwin