Thanks Brett, I may have missed that particular session where it was decided that additional items be introduced to WS1. A pointer to that transcript will be helpful and it will also be good to know what working party James team is called, their TOR and what their meeting modalities/timelines are. That said, I am concerned that the CCWG is introducing new items at this last minutes of WS1. It makes me wonder what our priorities are. Thanks again for your response. Regards Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 28 Oct 2015 19:30, "Schaefer, Brett" <Brett.Schaefer@heritage.org> wrote:

Seun,

At the CCWG meetings last week, there was agreement that the move from member to designator (and the lesser powers it would have in many areas, including the right of inspection) should result in transparency concerns being moved from WS2 up to WS1.

Best,

Brett

*From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Seun Ojedeji *Sent:* Tuesday, October 27, 2015 3:57 PM *To:* James Gannon *Cc:* accountability-cross-community@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG

Hi James,

If I may ask, which of the work stream or working party does this fall? Will be good to know what action item of the CCWG gave birth to this. A pointer will be appreciated.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos.

------------------------------ Brett Schaefer Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 202-608-6097 heritage.org

On 27 Oct 2015 20:16, "James Gannon" <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:

Hi Greg,

A number of NCSG members and others who spoke on this issue in Dublin including myself had started work on this during Dublin and once we had something that was readable we brought it to the group to continue the work.

-James

*From: *<accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> *Date: *Tuesday 27 October 2015 at 7:09 p.m. *To: *Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> *Cc: *CCWG-Accountability Community < accountability-cross-community@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG

In the interests of transparency, who is in the small subgroup?

Thanks!

Greg

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> wrote:

All:

Here is a link to a document intended to contribute to CCWG's work on improving transparency at ICANN:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/11sX-zY5uie9s7zNeGz2GIRXk7BBg2xrbN_pplpJn... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/11sX-zY5uie9s7zNeGz2GIRXk7BBg2xrbN_pplpJn...>

The doc is the creation of small subgroup of CCWG participants focusing on this transparency issue. Feedback is most welcome!

Thanks,

Robin

_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community