Hello all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the Stress Tests Meeting #12 on 13 October will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/DapYAw A copy of the notes may be found below. Thank you. Kind regards, Brenda Documents Presented * <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56142349/Stress%20Tests%20-... 20version%202.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1444765123000&api=v2> Stress Tests - analysis of PC2 version 2.pdf Notes 1) ST 18 for CCWG Consideration * Document at https://community.icann.org/x/bAEdAw under ST 18 rationale.docx 12 Oct 2015 * Given criticality of ST18 it will be presented to the full CCWG * Remove example in both places. * New rationale for including ST18 as per requests on last call. * Thomas Schneider (GAC): fyi: among gov input in the public comment period i have the following that failed to see a sense/rational in st18: SP, AR, FR, NO, BR, * New document will be included in the participant reading pack for Dublin so it can be discussed by the full CWG. * GAC participant still do not understand the need for ST18. 2) Divergence response on ST 29, 30 21, and 33 * Document at https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/ST-WP+Draft+Documents - Oct 12 2015 Stress Tests - analysis of PC2 [version 2].docx * ST 29, 30 Consequences proposed by the authors of ST29,30 should not of been included as is and should be replaced as proposed. Proposed: ST team recommends that the "consequence" stated in ST 29 and ST 30 be replaced with o "ICANN's enforcement of registry and registrar contract terms might be blocked by an IRP ruling citing amended Mission and Core Values. " o Also, the ST team recommends that the conclusion of ST 29 and 30 be replaced with "Proposed measures would be adequate to challenge ICANN enforcement actions, but it is unlikely that IRP panels would block enforcement of voluntary contract terms and consensus policies" * ST21 - second read - recommendation to maintain this as is. o ST Team believes we should retain current ST 21 analysis and not recommend other actions, pending policy development by the ccNSO. * ST33 - amend: The ST team recommends that we amend the conclusion of ST 33 (para 988) to o " Proposed accountability measures would be adequate, provided that the bylaws requirement for a "bottom-up, consensus-based, multistakeholder process" is interpreted by the board and IRP panelists to include assessment of how decisions were reached in an AC or SO." * Re - not allowing ACs to vote - o The ST team notes that a small minority of commenters opposed giving ACs voting roles, and therefore recommends. 3) New Stress Tests * Include new stress test for possible deadlock for a change to bylaws or fundamental bylaws. 4) Re-running all Stress Tests on new model (if needed) * If the CCWG settles on a new MODEL SDB noted that all stress tests would have to be rerun. * There was a suggestion on the CCWG call that the ST WP look at running the stress tests vs the three current models. Participants should consider running 1 test per category for a total of 5. However and hopefully coming out of Dublin the number of models will be reduced. AOB - none Adjourned.