CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #85 - Tuesday, 23 February @ 06:00 UTC
Dear All, In preparation for your call #85 <https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> - Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 - 08:00 UTC (time converter <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&i... ah=2> ), see below a proposed agenda: 1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI 2. Substantive discussion on way forward 3. AOB Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/ <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/> Thank you! Kind regards, Brenda
Dear Co-Chairs Item 2 f the agenda is Substantial discussion on a way forward? Discussion on what? Board's Recall threshold WHEN irp is available and when IRP is not available ( in case of non participation of GAC as results of Carve-Out application )? Please kindly clarify Regards Kavouss ? 2016-02-22 15:01 GMT+01:00 Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>:
Dear All,
In preparation for your call #85 <https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> – Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 – 08:00 UTC (time converter <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&i...>), see below a proposed agenda:
1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI
2. Substantive discussion on way forward
3. AOB
*Adobe Connect: *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Brenda
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Dear Co-Chair, In view of the extensive exchange of correspondence and divergence views expressed in regard with Paragraph 51 of Recommendation 2 now on advance publication, I formally request the co-chairs to put that paragraph Under Agenda Item 2. This request has been discussed with colleagues and would have their support. There should be no fear to discuss such an important item which could contribute to the support of chatering organizations to Rec. 2 Refusal of the co-chairs to do so ,would certainly have adverse affect on the definitive approval / consensus building of this item Regards Kavouss 2016-02-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs Item 2 f the agenda is Substantial discussion on a way forward?
Discussion on what? Board's Recall threshold WHEN irp is available and when IRP is not available ( in case of non participation of GAC as results of Carve-Out application )? Please kindly clarify Regards Kavouss ?
2016-02-22 15:01 GMT+01:00 Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>:
Dear All,
In preparation for your call #85 <https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> – Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 – 08:00 UTC (time converter <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&i...>), see below a proposed agenda:
1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI
2. Substantive discussion on way forward
3. AOB
*Adobe Connect: *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Brenda
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Kavouss do I understand that you now also wish to reopen the proposal on Fundamental Bylaws? As per Recommendation 2: [cid:233689A6-1857-4C10-994B-6435B4F50895] If so what reasoning is behind reopening yet more consensus based parts of our proposal? -James From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>> Date: Monday 22 February 2016 at 8:39 p.m. To: Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr<mailto:Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>>, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de>> Cc: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #85 - Tuesday, 23 February @ 06:00 UTC Dear Co-Chair, In view of the extensive exchange of correspondence and divergence views expressed in regard with Paragraph 51 of Recommendation 2 now on advance publication, I formally request the co-chairs to put that paragraph Under Agenda Item 2. This request has been discussed with colleagues and would have their support. There should be no fear to discuss such an important item which could contribute to the support of chatering organizations to Rec. 2 Refusal of the co-chairs to do so ,would certainly have adverse affect on the definitive approval / consensus building of this item Regards Kavouss 2016-02-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>>: Dear Co-Chairs Item 2 f the agenda is Substantial discussion on a way forward? Discussion on what? Board's Recall threshold WHEN irp is available and when IRP is not available ( in case of non participation of GAC as results of Carve-Out application )? Please kindly clarify Regards Kavouss ? 2016-02-22 15:01 GMT+01:00 Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org<mailto:brenda.brewer@icann.org>>: Dear All, In preparation for your call #85<https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> – Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 – 08:00 UTC (time converter<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&i...>), see below a proposed agenda: 1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI 2. Substantive discussion on way forward 3. AOB Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/ Thank you! Kind regards, Brenda _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Please can we all use the paragraph numbering from the 19 Feb version? That's para 72 and the bullet point, as I emailed yesterday. Best Jordan On Tuesday, 23 February 2016, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
Kavouss do I understand that you now also wish to reopen the proposal on Fundamental Bylaws?
As per Recommendation 2:
If so what reasoning is behind reopening yet more consensus based parts of our proposal?
-James
From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org');>> on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com');>> Date: Monday 22 February 2016 at 8:39 p.m. To: Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr');>>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','leonfelipe@sanchez.mx');>>, Thomas Rickert < rickert@anwaelte.de <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rickert@anwaelte.de');>> Cc: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','accountability-cross-community@icann.org');>" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','accountability-cross-community@icann.org');>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #85 - Tuesday, 23 February @ 06:00 UTC
Dear Co-Chair, In view of the extensive exchange of correspondence and divergence views expressed in regard with Paragraph 51 of Recommendation 2 now on advance publication, I formally request the co-chairs to put that paragraph Under Agenda Item 2. This request has been discussed with colleagues and would have their support. There should be no fear to discuss such an important item which could contribute to the support of chatering organizations to Rec. 2 Refusal of the co-chairs to do so ,would certainly have adverse affect on the definitive approval / consensus building of this item Regards Kavouss
2016-02-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com');>>:
Dear Co-Chairs Item 2 f the agenda is Substantial discussion on a way forward?
Discussion on what? Board's Recall threshold WHEN irp is available and when IRP is not available ( in case of non participation of GAC as results of Carve-Out application )? Please kindly clarify Regards Kavouss ?
2016-02-22 15:01 GMT+01:00 Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','brenda.brewer@icann.org');>>:
Dear All,
In preparation for your call #85 <https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> – Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 – 08:00 UTC (time converter <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&i...>), see below a proposed agenda:
1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI
2. Substantive discussion on way forward
3. AOB
*Adobe Connect: *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Brenda
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org');> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive, InternetNZ +64-21-442-649 | jordan@internetnz.net.nz Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
Dear James NOT AT ALL Regards Kavouss 2016-02-22 22:14 GMT+01:00 Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz>:
Please can we all use the paragraph numbering from the 19 Feb version?
That's para 72 and the bullet point, as I emailed yesterday.
Best Jordan
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
Kavouss do I understand that you now also wish to reopen the proposal on Fundamental Bylaws?
As per Recommendation 2:
If so what reasoning is behind reopening yet more consensus based parts of our proposal?
-James
From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> Date: Monday 22 February 2016 at 8:39 p.m. To: Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía < leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> Cc: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org" < accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #85 - Tuesday, 23 February @ 06:00 UTC
Dear Co-Chair, In view of the extensive exchange of correspondence and divergence views expressed in regard with Paragraph 51 of Recommendation 2 now on advance publication, I formally request the co-chairs to put that paragraph Under Agenda Item 2. This request has been discussed with colleagues and would have their support. There should be no fear to discuss such an important item which could contribute to the support of chatering organizations to Rec. 2 Refusal of the co-chairs to do so ,would certainly have adverse affect on the definitive approval / consensus building of this item Regards Kavouss
2016-02-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>:
Dear Co-Chairs Item 2 f the agenda is Substantial discussion on a way forward?
Discussion on what? Board's Recall threshold WHEN irp is available and when IRP is not available ( in case of non participation of GAC as results of Carve-Out application )? Please kindly clarify Regards Kavouss ?
2016-02-22 15:01 GMT+01:00 Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>:
Dear All,
In preparation for your call #85 <https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> – Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 – 08:00 UTC (time converter <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&i...>), see below a proposed agenda:
1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI
2. Substantive discussion on way forward
3. AOB
*Adobe Connect: *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Brenda
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive, InternetNZ
+64-21-442-649 | jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
participants (4)
-
Brenda Brewer -
James Gannon -
Jordan Carter -
Kavouss Arasteh