CWG Confirmation - Fundamental Bylaws inclusions
Dear Jonathan, Lise, Sharon On the CCWG-Accountability call today, we discussed the fundamental bylaws paper and the relationship with the requirements of the CWG-Stewardship's proposal. There has been some discussion as to whether we should reference the PTI structure, and the Separation review, alongside the CSC and the IANA Functions Review in our Second Public Comment Report. The last two items have been in the draft for a while. The first two have come in and out and as you can see from the *attached*, are currently out. We are relaxed I think about including them or not including them but seek your formal guidance on the question -- and if you have any, specific guidance as to the right way to reference if they are included. I'd appreciate your feedback by close of play Wednesday UTC if possible so we can resolve this on the CCWG-Accountability's next call on Thursday 23rd. Many thanks, Jordan Carter Rapporteur, Work Party 1 (Community Empowerment) CCWG-Accountability --
Dear Jordan, Thank you for this question which I have now had the opportunity to discuss with Lise. Sharon did helpfully provide input in relation to this and Lise and I are in agreement with that input. Therefore, I will forward that to this group so that you have the input as a reference and, hopefully, as a complete answer to your questions. Best wishes, Jonathan Please note: I am not sure that I have posting rights to the Accountability CCWG list so you may need to forward. From: Jordan Carter [mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz] Sent: 21 July 2015 23:55 To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>; Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr@difo.dk>; Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan@sidley.com> Cc: ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org>; Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de>; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>; Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>; Becky Burr <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz>; Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>; Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: CWG Confirmation - Fundamental Bylaws inclusions Dear Jonathan, Lise, Sharon On the CCWG-Accountability call today, we discussed the fundamental bylaws paper and the relationship with the requirements of the CWG-Stewardship's proposal. There has been some discussion as to whether we should reference the PTI structure, and the Separation review, alongside the CSC and the IANA Functions Review in our Second Public Comment Report. The last two items have been in the draft for a while. The first two have come in and out and as you can see from the attached, are currently out. We are relaxed I think about including them or not including them but seek your formal guidance on the question -- and if you have any, specific guidance as to the right way to reference if they are included. I'd appreciate your feedback by close of play Wednesday UTC if possible so we can resolve this on the CCWG-Accountability's next call on Thursday 23rd. Many thanks, Jordan Carter Rapporteur, Work Party 1 (Community Empowerment) CCWG-Accountability --
participants (2)
-
Jonathan Robinson -
Jordan Carter