Hi all, It's been a while! The lack of email on this list almost makes me nostalgic. I wanted to ask where we are in the process of approval of the CCWG WS2 report. To be more precise: have all SOs and ACs accepted the report? When is the board expected to discuss/approve the report? Wishing you all a great meeting in Barcelona! Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Researcher and PhD Candidate Datactive Research Group University of Amsterdam PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
Hi, Niels,
I wanted to ask where we are in the process of approval of the CCWG WS2 report. To be more precise: have all SOs and ACs accepted the report? When is the board expected to discuss/approve the report?
Quoting the GAC Barcelona communique: "The GAC is not in a position to approve or reject the recommendations on jurisdiction. Some GAC members support the recommendations. Other GAC members consider that they fall short of the objectives envisaged for Work Stream 2 and only partly mitigate the risks associated with ICANN’s subjection to US jurisdiction. The reasons why these members object to approving the recommendations are documented in the dissenting statement submitted to the CCWG by Brazil." Julf
That quote refers to jurisdiction. The FoI rec has bern approved by the GAC... best Jorge ________________________________ Von: Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> Datum: 26. Oktober 2018 um 15:40:15 MESZ An: accountability-cross-community@icann.org <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] WS2 report acceptance and approval? Hi, Niels,
I wanted to ask where we are in the process of approval of the CCWG WS2 report. To be more precise: have all SOs and ACs accepted the report? When is the board expected to discuss/approve the report?
Quoting the GAC Barcelona communique: "The GAC is not in a position to approve or reject the recommendations on jurisdiction. Some GAC members support the recommendations. Other GAC members consider that they fall short of the objectives envisaged for Work Stream 2 and only partly mitigate the risks associated with ICANN’s subjection to US jurisdiction. The reasons why these members object to approving the recommendations are documented in the dissenting statement submitted to the CCWG by Brazil." Julf _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Indeed. The GAC has approved the other recommendations apart from the one on jurisdiction. Julf On 26-10-18 17:00, Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch wrote:
That quote refers to jurisdiction. The FoI rec has bern approved by the GAC... best Jorge
________________________________
Von: Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> Datum: 26. Oktober 2018 um 15:40:15 MESZ An: accountability-cross-community@icann.org <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] WS2 report acceptance and approval?
Hi, Niels,
I wanted to ask where we are in the process of approval of the CCWG WS2 report. To be more precise: have all SOs and ACs accepted the report? When is the board expected to discuss/approve the report?
Quoting the GAC Barcelona communique:
"The GAC is not in a position to approve or reject the recommendations on jurisdiction. Some GAC members support the recommendations. Other GAC members consider that they fall short of the objectives envisaged for Work Stream 2 and only partly mitigate the risks associated with ICANN’s subjection to US jurisdiction. The reasons why these members object to approving the recommendations are documented in the dissenting statement submitted to the CCWG by Brazil."
Julf
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
participants (3)
-
Johan Helsingius -
Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch -
Niels ten Oever