Dear all, After today's sessions, and since I'm not a native english speaker, I would like to reiterate in written some of the points I made so that they are clear for everyone (see attached file) See you tomorrow --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Tijani. " Another issue regarding removing the board is leaving ICANN without board for a relatively long period (time necessary for electing directors selected by the SO/ACs and time for the nomcom to find and select the other members). In my opinion, ICANN can’t live one day without Board. That’s why I propose that the bylaws be changed so that each entity appointing or selecting the Board members appoint or select 2 persons: a Board director and an alternate one. If it happen (and I hope it will not) that the community remove the Board, the alternates will form the replacement board for the remaining term period of the outgoing board, or for an interim period till the process of selecting/appointing a new board." One option to consider is the process used with electing some Governments. By removing the Board - you are effectively triggering an early election/appointments process - perhaps with a defined timeframe - e.g. triggers a 90 day process to elect/appoint new Board members. During that period you could have the Board enter into a form of "caretaker" mode. In that mode - no new policies or new major expenditures (apart from the normal staff salary bill) would be able to be approved. Regards Bruce Tonkin
I think we should find out what existing "best practice" is from our counsel and/or experts. Spilling the board is not unknown, and there must be existing solutions. It's unlikely we'll need to invent one. Greg On Monday, March 23, 2015, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Tijani.
" Another issue regarding removing the board is leaving ICANN without board for a relatively long period (time necessary for electing directors selected by the SO/ACs and time for the nomcom to find and select the other members). In my opinion, ICANN can’t live one day without Board. That’s why I propose that the bylaws be changed so that each entity appointing or selecting the Board members appoint or select 2 persons: a Board director and an alternate one. If it happen (and I hope it will not) that the community remove the Board, the alternates will form the replacement board for the remaining term period of the outgoing board, or for an interim period till the process of selecting/appointing a new board."
One option to consider is the process used with electing some Governments.
By removing the Board - you are effectively triggering an early election/appointments process - perhaps with a defined timeframe - e.g. triggers a 90 day process to elect/appoint new Board members.
During that period you could have the Board enter into a form of "caretaker" mode. In that mode - no new policies or new major expenditures (apart from the normal staff salary bill) would be able to be approved.
Regards Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <javascript:;> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- *Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab* *Partner* *| IP | Technology | Media | Internet* *666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621* *Direct* 212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022 *Fax* 212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428 *gsshatan@lawabel.com <gsshatan@lawabel.com>* *ICANN-related: gregshatanipc@gmail.com <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>* *www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*
participants (3)
-
Bruce Tonkin -
Greg Shatan -
tijani.benjemaa＠topnet.tn