Opinions requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.
As per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD application (see PDF at http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD ), the New gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) kindly requests the opinions from the At-Large community on the comments received on the following new gTLD applications: .amazon ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG ) .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG ) .nyc ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG ) .health ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG ) To date, there are not enough comments by the At-Large community on these applications to determine whether there is substantial opposition as described in Section 3.5.4 of the Applicant Guidebook. This section describes 4 tests for the Dispute Resolution Service Provider hearing the objection to determine whether there is substantial opposition from a significant portion of the community to which the string may be targeted. For an objection to be successful, the objector must prove that: * The community invoked by the objector is a clearly delineated community; and * Community opposition to the application is substantial; and * There is a strong association between the community invoked and the applied-for gTLD string; and * The application creates a likelihood of material detriment to the rights or legitimate interests of a significant portion of the community to which the string may be explicitly or implicitly targeted. See https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg for more details about the criteria for objection grounds. You can post your opinions on the wiki pages linked to earlier or by visiting the new gTLD Dashboard at http://bit.ly/newgtld before the next gTLD RG conference call on February 1 2013 Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair
French below Hello All, Following Dev's email below, I would like to ask you to give your opinion about the following objection comments : *.amazon* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG ) *.patagonia* (https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG ) *.nyc* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG ) *.health* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG ) IMHO, we, as Africans, we would first focus on the *.health* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG ) before the other 3 first three comments which address more LACRALO and NARALO. I would certainly support those regions' advice. ---------------------------------- Bonjour tout le monde, Suite au mail de Dev ci-dessous, je voudrais vous demander de donner votre avis a propos des commentaires pour objection qui suivent: *.amazon* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG ) *.patagonia* (https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG ) *.nyc* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG ) *.health* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG ) A mon humble avis, en tant qu'Africains, nous pourrions d'abord examiner * .health* ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG ) avant les 3 premiers commentaires qui s'adressent plus a LACRALO et NARALO. J'appuierai certainement l'avis de ces regions. Fatimata ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> Date: 2013/1/26 Subject: [At-Large] Opinions requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications. To: afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org, apac-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org, euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org, LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org, At-Large Worldwide < at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> As per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD application (see PDF at http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD ), the New gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) kindly requests the opinions from the At-Large community on the comments received on the following new gTLD applications: .amazon ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG ) .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG ) .nyc ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG ) .health ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG ) To date, there are not enough comments by the At-Large community on these applications to determine whether there is substantial opposition as described in Section 3.5.4 of the Applicant Guidebook. This section describes 4 tests for the Dispute Resolution Service Provider hearing the objection to determine whether there is substantial opposition from a significant portion of the community to which the string may be targeted. For an objection to be successful, the objector must prove that: * The community invoked by the objector is a clearly delineated community; and * Community opposition to the application is substantial; and * There is a strong association between the community invoked and the applied-for gTLD string; and * The application creates a likelihood of material detriment to the rights or legitimate interests of a significant portion of the community to which the string may be explicitly or implicitly targeted. See https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg for more details about the criteria for objection grounds. You can post your opinions on the wiki pages linked to earlier or by visiting the new gTLD Dashboard at http://bit.ly/newgtld before the next gTLD RG conference call on February 1 2013 Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org -- Fatimata Seye Sylla
participants (2)
-
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Fatimata Seye Sylla