Hi,
I watched and rewatched and I'm not troubled by the the inconsistency pointed out by Dev Anand. I understand aspects of the the concerns but In my humble opinion:
I think our contention should be for them to list them alphabetically, which may help "AT-LARGE" to standout more. towards, the top of the frame.
Also that frame does not really appear to be a significant point of education nor at action item, it is mostly just entertaining animation.
More importantly though, I personally don't think that anything needs to be changed in the video.
Our challenge is perhaps, the continued evolution and improvement
(improved though it is already) of our outreach, especially to the
newcomers, nextgen & fellows plus our effective mentoring of
those captured into what is the easiest "catch all" grouping
within the ICANN substructure. Also locally and regionally keeping
the engine and effectiveness going. I can't help but still feel as
if At-Large is outgunned a bit on outreach and mentoring.
I'm also more concerned that the call to action "go.icann.org/journey"
redirects to "https://www.icann.org/dprd".
I'm not sure this is the most simple, welcoming and salient
landing page / introduction that it could have lead potential
newcomers to.
To touch on the other points lightly:
Hello all,
as this is a fellowship originated video, I doubt that they'd do that. The ICANN Comms department asks for our feedback when producing something for the ALAC/At-Large, but I have not seen them ask for community feedback in broader communication videos. It is a pity as the feedback would have been beneficial in this case.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 03/05/2017 16:36, Glenn McKnight wrote:
Perhaps they should send the draft in the advance for community feedbackG
289-830 6259
.
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Beran Dondeh via Alac-sc-outreach <alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
Dear All
My question is can we raise it with staff to have it changed ?
Beran
Sent from my iPhoneFinally, who is going to watch the video? People already involved in ICANN, people curious about what ICANN is all about. This brings me back to the idea of "outreach and engagement". What is the goal? Are we effectively recruiting the audience we seek?I would expect a follow-up video to focus, not on NextGen and Fellowship Programs, but the sort of "technical or skills" (mentioned on video) one should have to apply. If I have to navigate to another site for more details the video is lacking its purpose.Hello to all:I agree with @Dev that the video promotion has a good intention, but it does not convey the expected message of volunteerism. How can you invite individuals to get involved if you do not use actual photos of the community? How do yo expect to get people involved if one of the organizations RALO's is not mentioned (only ICANN as a multistakeholder organization)? How many watching the video understand the concept?
My 2cents worth.
![]()
Alfredo Calderon
eLearning Consultantcalderon.alfredo@gmail.com | http://aprendizajedistancia. blogspot.com | Skype: Alfredo_1212 | wiseintro.co/alfredocalderon
Get a signature like this: Click here!
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Niran Beharry <nbeharrytt@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 Dev i think the at-large and alac should get recognized as a part of the community
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Its more than just poor product placement. It reduces the fellows and netgen into small uniform animated characters vs the use of actual pictures. Tons of good quality pictures exist demonstrating diversity and equity across the globe.It fails also to acknowledge the use of subtitles which all US 501C are obligated to use.
G
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
______________________________A new ICANN video titled "NextGen & Fellows Video" promoting how one
can get involved in ICANN via the Nextgen and Fellows program. It also
tries to explain what is the DNS and ICANN in a simple way.
https://youtu.be/nrV_ZkDEfIQ
I think its a good video.
HOWEVER,
At the 36 second mark where the voiceover mentions the volunteer
community, all of the ACs and SOs are listed to the left side of the
spinning globe in a fashion like
ICANN | <acronym of AC or SO>
<name of AC and SO>
EXCEPT
for ICANN At-Large - the At-Large logo is displayed. (screenshot attached)
The result:
1) Because ICANN At-Large is treated differently, we appear invisible
and not part of the community - because the target audience is not
aware of the At-Large logo, I suspect many will not see At-Large at
all and treat the logo as some sort of arbitrary graphic floating
around.
2) The completely different styling makes us be seen as outside the
legitimate multi-stakeholder community.
We should have been treated and displayed equally as the other ACs and SOs.
Regards,
Dev Anand
_________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
_______________________________________________ Alac-sc-outreach mailing list Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ Alac-sc-outreach mailing list Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach