Best of the day.
Remmy Nweke
@ITRealms
1* What would be the criterion for deciding if an ALS is not engaged in your RALO/At-Large?
I think there was some criterion set at the inception. A look at it would help in determining if they are meeting the demands in their ALS expectations.
2* Do RALOs have a list of non-engaged ALSes?
There should be a subtle research in this respect based on the expectations outlined in the application as what they engage in vis a vis current demands of ALS.
Act
participation could be one of the criteria.
3* What are possible approaches to deal with non-engaged ALSes?
Nos 1 and 2 above must be taken into consideration to determine the No. 3.
4- Decide to pick some ALSes to focus and mentor with? What criteria do we use
to pick which ones and why?
The aforesaid research on ALS non-engagement will help in fashioning if some need mentoring and in what areas, then viable members could be asked to pick those for mentoring based on know-how and regional where necessary.
5- Do we survey those non-engaged ALSes to find out why they are not engaged?
(A challenge is that they may not respond to a survey)
This question is similar to offshoot of No. 2 above. But directly YES and find out their challenges. You should not be concerned if they did not respond, our concern is to do the needful which in this case is find out via survey, period and then move on from there.
6* How can ALSes, especially newer ALSes be more engaged when they join At-Large?
We may ask them to join a sub-committee after acceptance and then plan an induction at the nearest ICANN to integrate them into the fold, especially those they could work with and receive mentorship.
This could begin with a webinar/documentary on what is ALAC and ALS, modalities of engagement.
7- Perhaps by having the sort of material, not necessarily a beginner's guide,
but some form of infographcs and short videos are needed.
A good idea needs no further colouration.
8. Maybe we need to look at ICANN Learn, or Glenn's ebook project to see how to convey these concepts on how ALSes can be involved. The At-Large website redesign is also looking at these concepts of how we reach persons to get involved.
The concept eventually adopted must be web-based and accessible online at all times.Dear All,With the discussion of the outreach strategies on the September 8 2015 call (https://community.icann.org/x/iYRYAw), we didn't have a chance to discuss on first steps for
strategies for At-Large engagement.Its an important topic as I'm sure all RALOs have many ALSes that and I therefore want to begin discussions before our next conference call.I've created a wiki space atfor us to comment on and get some ideas.Some first thoughts to get the discussions about engagement going:
Some first ideas to generate discussion:
* What would be the criterion for deciding if an ALS is not engaged in your RALO/At-Large?
* Do RALOs have a list of non-engaged ALSes?
* What are possible approaches to deal with non-engaged ALSes?
- Decide to pick some ALSes to focus and mentor with? What criteria do we use to pick which ones and why?
- Do we survey those non-engaged ALSes to find out why they are not engaged? (A challenge is that they may not respond to a survey)
* How can ALSes, especially newer ALSes be more engaged when they join At-Large?
- Perhaps by having the sort of material, not necessarily a beginner's guide, but some form of infographcs and short videos are needed. Maybe we need to look at ICANN Learn, or Glenn's ebook project to see how to convey these concepts on how ALSes can be involved. The At-Large website redesign is also looking at these concepts of how we reach persons to get involved.Kind Regards,Dev Anand Teelucksingh
_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach