No typo... CROP has now done a complete about turn on its original policy which was NOT to include ICANN meetings. Now it is "mainly for" ICANN Public meetings.
However, "if a RALO or eligible GNSO group has used at least one allocation for an ICANN meeting (or ICANN-organized meeting), it may use its remaining allocation(s) for meetings that are assessed by the relevant regional GSE VP as being directly and demonstrably related to ongoing ICANN policy, technical or advisory activities (e.g. RIR meetings). "
Does that mean only after a RALO has used one of its three allocated slots for an ICANN meeting? What if an appropriate meeting for CROP occurs BEFORE an ICANN meeting opportunity?
Why isn't a representative from At-Large and gNSO included onto the decision making team when they re developing such policies so that we could at least negotiate something that it is more fair and reasonable for both parties. This is ridiculous.