Hi,

Glenn brings up some great issues. Keep in mind that some of us do not even qualify for most forms of fellowship according to present rules. Thus, our work is purely on a volunteer, when available and able set aside from personal income to assist to some events where some believe we can be of help.

All the cross reference data analysis is a great way to validate the effectiveness of the actual fellowship programs. Thus, lessons learned to improve for the future.


photo
Alfredo Calderon
eLearning Consultant
      
Get a signature like this: Click here!

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dev

A number of issues come to mind
1. Beyond the obvious what is the selection criteria
2. How many applications
3. What is the split based upon category ie. civil society, gov etc
4. If civil society is the core group for Outreach and Engagement what is our success
5 What efforts have we done to Outreach to those members
6 How many volunteers have be obtained through the fellowship program

If the Fellowship is important to ALAC then we need to create ways and means of reaching those potential volunteers in a meaningful way.  Perhaps we need to add this as an issue on our next call.

Glenn

Glenn McKnight
mcknight.glenn@gmail.com
skype  gmcknight
twitter gmcknight
.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All

Glenn Mcknight did a spreadsheet breaking down the Fellowship
recipients by region.
I've produced an updated version with additional sheets to allow for
easier display of fellowship applicants by region or by country

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15882YWPkhx-Gv2tAEPBdJPJKK5QBjvsX2_mvRyDJUQs/edit?usp=sharing

Screencast: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5oss2emxhlsz8v0/Outreach-Engagement-Fellowship-Analysis.gif

In addition, I also did some research in the ICANN country names and
the ISO country names to study the differences. You can look at the
comparisons-of-ICANN-ISO sheet to see some of the differences and
highlighting the importance of the georegions report now under
comment. One of the challenges are that the Fellowship uses different
country/territory names than the ICANN or ISO list ; the Fellowship
sheet notes the changes made to align the country names in the
fellowship announcements to the ICANN and ISO lists

Finally, I've also implemented a methodology so that a fellowship
announcement list can be pasted into the "temp" tab for quick
breakdown and sorting.

I inputed the data from ICANN 39 to the present ICANN55, I'll polish
off the rest later tomorrow

Hopefully, the spreadsheet will continue to be more useful for
locating persons that attended fellowship that could be possible
members of At-Large or who know persons and/or organisations that
could be potential members of At-Large.

Kind Regards,

Dev Anand
_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach


_______________________________________________
Alac-sc-outreach mailing list
Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach




--