I know the GAC has said it needs multiple people because they could not find individuals to do a full load. That being said, I believe we need a core that will participate fully. So I do not think we will modify the words, but clearly we will need to be flexible in how we select people.

Alan

At 11/07/2018 09:36 AM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond wrote:

Dear Alan,

I am reading your call for candidates for the EPDP and one thing (in particular) has raised my attention:

On 11/07/2018 01:50, Alan Greenberg wrote:

Membership in the EPDP is expected to require up to 30 hours per week, starting immediately and at least for the first 4 months, and probably a lower but still significant commitment until mid-2018. The GNSO is also setting some very specific criteria for participation. Although the list may change, the current requirements are as follows:

When we asked about this "up to 30 hours per week" and wondered whether this was reasonable for a volunteer, we were told that this doesn't mean 30 hours of calls per week, but the total number of hours including document reading and drafting could be 30 hours per week.

I still wonder whether this is reasonable to ask from a volunteer. Could these 30 hours per week be pooled?

Kindest regards,

Olivier
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )