Hi,
 
I agree that it is indeed comprehensive and to the point. 
 
However, after writing policy recommendations to the government for years, my experience keeping it brirf and right to the point is vital, for top officials are not dumb but their time is scarce.  I don't know if that is the case for ICANN as well.
 
Best regards,
Kaili
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Eduardo Diaz
To: Alan Greenberg ; ALAC
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Almost final Multi-Year GA/Summit Proposal

I found the document to be very comprehensive and to the point. I recommend to keep it the way it is. 

My thanks to the group that put this together.

-ed

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:56 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Attached please fine the final proposal, subject to final clean-up
editing (and inclusion of the missing URL on the last page).

Please forward any critical errors to me and Heidi.

Note that this paper must be submitted to the Budget Public Comment
prior to 23:59 UTC on Saturday, 30 April.

Alan
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)