Thank you Andrei for bring the update to our attention. 

" RDDS access must comply with the law, but access should not be less timely, more restricted, and less public than law requires."

I am and remain a fan of the SSAC's publications because of the detail, the close reasoning and totally unemotional views expressed. I can confirm this publication follows the time-honoured quality of the SSAC's and should be read in its entirety.

-Carlton



==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround

=============================


On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:21 AM Andrei Kolesnikov <andrei@rol.ru> wrote:
Dear ALAC members, please be advised about recent publication of SSACv2 advisory and addendum with rationale.

SSAC101v2: SSAC Advisory Regarding Access to Domain Name Registration Data version 2.
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-v2-en.pdf>

The SSAC published an addendum along with SAC101v2 to explain the rationale for version 2.
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-v2-addendum-en.pdf>

Yours, --andrei

--
Andrey Kolesnikov

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)