Justine,
I agree with your revised list and the explanation you gave.
Tijani
Le 8 mai 2019 à 04:05, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> a écrit :
Keith's proposal had been added to https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/icann65-proposed-topics
Off the back of my earlier feedback through the CPWG mail list (which incidentally didn't get through this mail list) where I also thought it would be sensible to group certain topics together. I had:
- WHOIS accuracy, GDPR, EPDP2, Unified Access Model
- SSR2, ATRT3, NomCom Review Implementation
- Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and implementation
- UA
- Privacy and Proxy Implementation (I chose to keep this separated from group 1 because of its in-limbo status)
- DoH
- Future of Multistakeholder Model of Governance
And revising my list of priorities for HIT vs At-Large at Marrakech:
- 7. Future of Multistakeholder Model of Governance --- both HIT & At-Large priority, coming off the recently published call for comments (for talking points)
- 3. Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and implementation --- both HIT & At-Large priority, especially insofar as recourse for the CCTRT report is concerned
- 4. UA -- HIT for considering approach to community / consensus policy (certainly At-Large talking points as a follow on from Kobe meeting)
- 6. DoH -- At-Large priority for understanding & considering implications to end-users (if not HIT as well)
IMO, groups 1 and 2 are at this point better suited as updates rather than for HIT sessions -- let the various WGs/EPDP/RTs carry on with their work.
Same goes for the other GNSO topics which Keith raised where they don't already appear in the above list of 7.
J