1. Yes, 2. No 3. Yes

I fully support the comments made by Olivier and Maureen.

Consensus consultation and transparency provide the foundation for democratic process. If ICANN is serious in its dedication to creating a democratic global governance system, then commitment to consensus consultation and transparency is key. Substantive movement towards confrontational legalistic processes may undermine the strategic goals of the organisation and the spirit to which the volunteers are committed.

Murray McKercher



On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:


Yes, No and No.

At 30/05/2015 10:04 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

>1. Do you believe that failing anything else, we must have the
>ability to remove parts of or all of the Board?
>
>2. With the exception of Board member removal, do we need legal
>enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member
>removal if you supported that).
>
>3. If the final CCWG proposal calls for full legal enforceability,
>is that sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it?
>
>Alan

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+ (ALAC)