On 25 October 2017 at 19:15, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:

[The Board intends]
to as ask SOs, ACs, and CCWGs to "...include a similar analysis in recommendations, policies, and advice submitted to the Board for consideration."

Perhaps the Board would consider reimbursing people for the time spent fulfilling its new demands.

That is, all those except those who are already on someone else's payroll or contract and will happily increase their billing.

Or maybe it would hire more staff to provide the extra hours needed to fulfill..... unlikely.

Does nobody understand that these extra demands involve a COST to the community?

That is, unless your time has no value.

When the Board wishes to direct ICANN's own resources, need is always meticulously measured against resource availability and cost.

When creating new impositions on the volunteer community, no such considerations appear to be in play.

Shameful.

Meanwhile, Alan's stated initiative to triage requests for public comment and streamline the related decision-making is welcome and to be encouraged.

- Evan