As I read it, looks like a known maneuver to bring back old overseen.  At least they are learning with the Latinos, since here is this way that things change…

 

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 

Sorry for any typos. 

 

 

 

 

 

From: ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 16:03
To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>
Cc: 'ALAC List' <ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] NOI published by NTIA

 

Um, maybe this move is the old 'flag up the pole'. Consent can be manufactured, too.

 

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:

HOW indeed!

Ignoring for the moment WHY, can you think of a
better way to force the creation of an alternate
route than by having the US Government seize
control of IANA, or even having ICANN give it back?

At 05/06/2018 10:53 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:

>The NOI includes some questions in relation to
>the IANA transition. Most precisely it raises
>the question on whether the transition should be unwound and if so, how?

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)