Dear Alan,

I am sorry, but I do not understand why the At-Large working groups that deal with exactly this type of work are not included and kept more up to date about this work that was going on.

- At-Large Social Media Working Group
- ALAC Subcommittee on Outreach and Engagement

The RALOs were not involved or informed of progress either.

As a result, I have just lived a 1 hour groundhog day, that is, a repetition of all of the discussions that have taken place at RALO and RALO Secretariat and at working group level, with questions being asked in the document, that are already being addressed, and some already being responded to; with people making points that have already been made at RALO and RALO Secretariat and at working group level.

On the one hand, we defend the need for the At-Large Community to have working groups and RALOs. On the other, we completely sideline them by having an ad-hoc ALS Communication Plan Task Force and a document that gets sent to the ALAC working list only (and no other lists).

We really need to look at what we do objectively and decide whether we want to practice what we preach or not. Otherwise, we risk being accused of schizophrenia or, worse still, hypocrisy.

Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 14/03/2017 02:19, Alan Greenberg wrote:

Please find attached document for discussion on Tuesday.

Alan

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html