As I was creating the finale approved version of the RoP, I realized that I had made an error. During the last review, Sebastien had suggested that the ALAC Member seconding the motion to reappoint the Board Member should be from a different region. There was no objection and I readily agreed to make that change. However, I never did.

Although the omission does not alter the final impact of such a motion, I agreed with Sebastien that it set the right tone. I'm not sure it is worth redoing the vote to correct my mistake, but that is certainly possible.

Alternatively, I would suggest that this be noted for the next revision, and if such a motion is made in the interim, I would suggest that the Chair ensure that there is multi-region support prior to initiating discussion of the motion.

Alan

At 2022-08-16 01:20 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff via ALAC wrote:

Dear All,

Following the close of the ALAC vote on the ALAC Rules of Procedure (RoPs) revision, the revisions have been adopted with option B (Super Majority).

Please see the detailed vote results below:

ALAC vote on the RoP Revision.