Some issues should be categorised for webinars and technical issues. What is the endusers role in DoH/DoT? This is where the discussion starts and th drive it towards policy. Are there any current policies that are related to DoH/DoT? If yes, we put it on table for discussion .
My opinion is lets build a use case to recommend what ammendments need to be done.
Thanks Maureen - and sorry for the delay in responding
I like this list and would be happy for it to be followed.
My one reservation: At some point, the implications of DoH and DoT should be discussed. I note Satish's comments - and would point out that his fears are exactly what was said by the presenter in the ALAC session in Kobe. My response - the presenter said that they are NOW being used so, like them or not, they are being used so we should at least acknolwedge that we do/do not support further discussion about issues raised - which can happen in ALAC if not in a more general session
Holly
----- Original Message -----From:"Maureen Hilyard" <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com>To:"ALAC" <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>Cc:Sent:Sat, 4 May 2019 17:33:58 -1000Subject:[ALAC] The consolidated approach proposed by Keith DrazekHi allI finally found what I was looking for. This was Keith's consolidated approach proposed on April 30 for your consideration (to mnimise the number of HIT sessions in Marrakech)
1 Impact of GDPR and EPDP Phase 1 Recommendations on Existing Policies and Procedures. Combine 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 into one session 1.1 Combatting Abuse with GDPR 1.2 Privacy-Proxy Implementation 1.3 Across Field Validation 2 EPDP Phase 2 / Uniform Access Model REMOVE these two proposed sessions because EPDP Phase 2 work will only have been under way for 6 weeks by the time we arrive in Marrakech. It may be premature to schedule a HIT/CC session - possibly defer this to ICANN66 in Montreal 3 Sessions that are merely updates can be provided as a pre-meeting webinar. 3.1 ATRT3 3.2 SSR-2 3.3 NomCom Review 4 Future of Multistakeholder Model Governance Is necessary to complete the project kicked off in Kobe by the year's end. Clearly a topic of interest to the entire community. This session should be included. 5 Enhance Effectiveness of Specific Review Recommedations and their Implementation This session is timely, particularly with developments around the Board's actions on the CCT-RT recommendations . This session should be included 6 Universal Acceptance There was a good bit of discussion in Kobe and it is an issue that appears to be generating increased interest. With the meeting being held in Marrakech, it is a good opportunity to continue discussions on the UA and IDM-related issues. 7 DNS over HTTPS (DoH) Not seen as having broad community interest at this time. Could possibly be a regular session but would REMOVE. 8 GNSO proposing these topics for one CC session 8.1 Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy 8.2 Uniform Rapid Suspension system (URS) rules 8.3 WHOIS Data Reminder Policy 8.4 Transfer Policy 8.5 Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy 8.6 Across Field Validation 8.7 Process for handing RAA Data Retention Waiver Requests 8.8 Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) 8.9 WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS) 8.10 Thick WHOIS Transition policy for .com, .net, .jobs
Comments please
Maureen
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)