Sorry, I should have checked by this got by me.

I presume the $10 in the statement should have been 10%  and I really don't understand what is meant by "is also out of scope for an ICANN Registry Agreement", since it is clearly not out of scope. It is not the norm, and is out of scope for a NORMAL registry agreement, but certainly is in scope for this very unusual agreement.

I suggest the this sentence be dropped and the statement re-issued.

Alan

At 30/05/2017 07:04 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote:

Dear All,
 
Please be so kind to find attached the ALAC Statement on the Proposed Renewal of .NET Registry Agreement.
 
In the interest of time, the ALAC Chair requested that the Statement be transmitted to the ICANN public comment process, copying the ICANN Staff member responsible for this topic, with a note that the Statement is pending ALAC ratification. Once ratified, this Statement will be resubmitted incorporating updated ratification information in the introduction section.
 
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org
Website: atlarge.icann.org
Facebook: facebook.com/icann atlarge
Twitter: @ ICANNAtLarge
 
 
Content-Type: application/pdf; name="AL-ALAC-ST-0517-07-00-EN.pdf"
Content-Description: AL-ALAC-ST-0517-07-00-EN.pdf
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="AL-ALAC-ST-0517-07-00-EN.pdf";
         size=241838; creation-date="Tue, 30 May 2017 23:04:44 GMT";
         modification-date="Tue, 30 May 2017 23:04:44 GMT"
Content-ID: <944AB3A64D187B4E9FF9870710BA62A2@pexch112.icann.org>
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;DM5PR03MB2714;27:BUowScGu0hA4GBTcD/FJ69QsbdHvvSOlLQrtTS2lb4fL6BFuFe5vGCTFzjx46jlFiJotAUKXPaJMd2YqQ+o7zna9yqtpeOTHDTw0pGRGA33OcCMeKkjtECf7zmZe7xgMo8faEMUrWb9wD34FaKxxKw==
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
         ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000100)(400125000095)(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028)(400001001128)(400125100095)(400001002128)(400125200095);