I would suggest that this is better approached starting with a private conversation. I presume you mean an ALAC Liaison TO the GAC. I don't think there would be any interest (in the GAC) with the opposite.

Alan

At 02/03/2016 03:04 AM, Sébastien Bachollet wrote:

Maybe I ma late but can we add?
Exchange of liaison between GAC and ALAC
Thanks
Skills are useful but diversity is essential.

Sébastien Bachollet
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr /
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@bachollet.com >

De : < alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca >
Date : mercredi 2 mars 2016 05:05
À : ALAC < alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Objet : [ALAC] Topics for ALAC-GAC Meeting

Brief updates:

CCWG Accountability - current status with ALAC and GAC
New gTLD Safeguards

New ICANN meeting structure - impacts on GAC and ALAC
New gTLDs - Future Rounds - GNSO PDP
The GAC may add additional items.

We will discuss further on the weekend.

Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)