Not just staff...I was thinking ICANN org leadership...needs authority

Sent from my Pixel 3XL

John Laprise, Ph.D.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 9:02 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote:

John, do you really mean "ICANN org", ie staff, to make that decision?

Alan

--

Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

On March 1, 2019 9:00:50 AM EST, John Laprise <jlaprise@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi and thanks Olivier,

My apologies for not being clear. I was suggesting a possible bylaws change where in ICANN org can ask the community to initiate policy development when it sees an urgent/important need that the community has not noticed.

Sent from my Pixel 3XL

John Laprise, Ph.D.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 7:07 AM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:

Dear John,

please be so kind to find my response below:

On 01/03/2019 13:31, John Laprise wrote:

Well said Evan and I share your concerns. If memory serves, so does the Board as MSM threats is a strategic planning issue. Musing upon waking I was wondering whether it would help if we could implement a mechanism whereby ICANN org could ask the empowered community to implement a pdp? This might've avoided the current epdp issue.

The ICANN Board and the Empowered Community cannot implement or launch PDPs relating to gTLDs. The "PDP" as such is a defined term for "Policy Development Process" and in the context of the Generic Names, only the GNSO can launch a PDP. In the context of Country Codes Names, when it relates to global policy, the ccNSO can launch a PDP.

The Board can ask the GNSO to launch a PDP on a gTLD related issue, but the GNSO can refuse.

The Board can also ask the ICANN communities, SOs/ACs to launch a Cross Community Working Group (CCWG). However, there are doubts expressed in the GNSO that CCWGs should *not* be the basis for policy making for gTLDs as all policy making for gTLDs should go through a PDP.

It's a power game and the bottom line is who has the control of policy processes on gTLDs.

Kindest regards,

Olivier