There was one type and two sentences that were unclear. A new version is
being sent, but see below for the specifics.
At 21/10/2015 10:36 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hello Alan,
A few comments below:
Alan wrote: "...The cases of directors appointed by the Board, or
entire Board removal will be dealt with later..."
Do you mean this will not be addressed by the CCWG?
No, I meant it would be dealt with later in the document - the next
section.
and are there instances where
board unilaterally appoints board member?
That should have been appointed by the NomCom.
Alan wrote: "....To be
clear, although the Sole Designator may be used to communicate the result
of a community decision, it is the entire set of AC/SO communities that
may participate in any decision....."
Sorry, "any community decision".
Alan
Well considering the current
CCWG proposal, this is not entirely accurate in the case of the
individual board removal. Nevertheless I guess there is no need to raise
it as an issue again.
Regards
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Alan Greenberg
<alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca
> wrote:
- Since there seems to be some confusion about the "Sole
Designator" model, at least partly because of the horrible name, I
put together this description. I did pass it by Leon, so I think it is
pretty accurate.
- I hope you find it useful.
- Alan
- _______________________________________________
- ALAC mailing list
-
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
-
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
- At-Large Online:
http://www.atlarge.icann.org
- ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Seun Ojedeji,
- Federal University Oye-Ekiti
- web:
http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
- Mobile: +2348035233535
- alt email:
seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng
- Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
action!