Hi Alan

Although I was ok with the original statement and have voted accordingly, I dont mind the change.

Maureen

On 6/01/2017 7:07 am, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time.

The 4th point currently reads:

4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users.

I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly.

I am proposing that instead we say:

4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement.

I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it.

If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine.

Alan

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)