Hi all,
I agree with what has been said by all. Let’s not forget this was an exercise and for conversations in the hallways with a couple of Board members, I believe they didn’t like it very much either.
Yes, absolutely, to have any ALAC member speak. Yes to the timer. Yes to having the conversation moving once we have advanced on the subject of discussion.
I respectfully disagree with the perception of this being just another ALAC petition for money. I believe that whilst money could well solve part of the problem that was discussed, it definitely is much more than money behind it. I think it was a matter of principles and strengthening the MSM within our own community which unintentionally ended benefiting the ICANN wide community as the emergency fund will be set for all SO/ACs and that, from my point of view, is great news for all. Some might well not need it but the intent to help is there however.
As per distribution of seats, I think having a setup similar to that of the ALAC would work and not only be perceived but actually be more open.
+1 Sandra about being more inclusive of others for input if they wanted to add anything, and a timer... but at least the Board were trying something different.
Pity about Steve and Fadi having their backs to the audience, but they didn't start the cameras up until half way through so that the audience could see all the speakers. One of the disadvantages of a "round" table.
Steve did mention that they too had had lots of volunteers for their limited places. Also I guess it depends on what the topics are and who has something of any significance to say.
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)