Hello,
I would like to caution the use of the term charities.
If in the use of the ICANN auction proceed (not the .O) we end up supporting that ICANN be the vehicle to distribute the founds and be given to projects (yes - that support the public good and the Internet Community). It may be that no charity will be involved.
I support the idea that .O auction found support the public good and the Internet Community.
All the best
SeB

Le 21 juin 2018 à 15:35, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> a écrit :

As we listed examples, several types fall into thiss category. We are not classifying as been for charities or not, all is inclused in my view what is relevant is the kind of project that needed to be under the mission of ICANN.
Kisses to all and safe trips to Panama.
 
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
 
 
 
 
 
From: ALAC < alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Fatimata Seye Sylla <fsylla@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 17:06
To: Bastiaan Goslings < bastiaan.goslings@ams-ix.net>
Cc: 'ALAC List' < alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca >
Subject: Re: [ALAC] URGENT: Supplementary Comment on .O release
 
Agree !
Fatimata
 
On Jun 21, 2018 3:21 AM, "Bastiaan Goslings" < bastiaan.goslings@ams-ix.net> wrote:

I too agree

Bastiaan

--
Envoyé de mon iPhone

> On 21 Jun 2018, at 04:24, Holly Raiche < h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> Agreed
>
> Holly
>> On 21 Jun 2018, at 7:07 am, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote:
>>
>> In light of other comments posted, Jonathan has suggested that we issue a supplemental comment making it clear that we beleive that the auction proceeds must go to charities that support the public good and the Internet Community. Moreover, the TLD must actually be used and not acquired for speculation/resale.
>>
>> I strongly suggest that we post this comment and ratify after the fact.
>>
>> Is there any strong opposition to this?
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

--
Please note: this communication is confidential, legally privileged and subject to a disclaimer https://ams-ix.net/about/email-disclaimer

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

 
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )